Hemeroteca

Exposición de motivos. Título preliminar. Ambito de aplicación. Título Primero. Recursos de las Haciendas Locales. Capítulo I. Enumeración. Capítulo II. Ingresos de Derecho privado. Capítulo III. Tributos. Capítulo IV. Participación en los tributos del Estado y de las Comunidades Autónomas. Capítulo V. Subvenciones. Capítulo VI. Precios públicos. Capítulo VII. Operaciones de crédito. Título II. Recursos de los municipios. Capítulo I. Enumeración. Capítulo II. Tributos propios. Capítulo III. Participación en Tributos del Estado. Capítulo IV. Precios públicos. Capítulo V. Prestación personal y de transporte. Título III. Recursos de las Provincias. Capítulo I. Enumeración. Capítulo II. Recursos tributarios. Capítulo III. Participación en Tributos del Estado. Capítulo IV. Subvenciones. Capítulo V. Precios públicos. Capítulo VI. Otros recursos. Título IV. Recursos de otras Entidades locales. Capítulo primero. Recursos de las Entidades supramunicipales. Capítulo II. Recursos de las Entidades de ámbito territorial inferior al Municipio. Título V. Regímenes especiales. Capítulo I. Baleares. Capítulo II. Canarias. Capítulo III. Ceuta y Melilla. Capítulo IV. Madrid. Capítulo V. Barcelona. Título VI. Presupuesto y gasto público. Capítulo I. De los presupuestos. Capítulo II. De la Tesorería de las Entidades locales. Capítulo III. De contabilidad. Capítulo IV. Control y fiscalización. Disposiciones Adicionales. Disposiciones Transitorias. Disposición Derogatoria. Disposición Final.

Chapter One - General provisions. Chapter Two- Duties, obbligation and privileges of public officials. Chapter three - Code of conduct. Chapter four - Improved service quality. Chapter five - Chapter implementation modalities.

1. The importance of auditor independence. 2. On the nature of auditing, policy, and politics. 3. Public policy, political audits, and response. a) Institutional Independence. b) Process Independence, Politically Driven Audits, and the Perception of Audit Independence. c) Political Claims about the Auditor "Mandate". Auditing and Party Politics. 4. The auditor politicized. 5. Politicization and institutional independence. 6. Implications. 7. Notes. 8. References.

INTRODUCTION.THE LAWMAKERS. OBTAINING THE COMMITMENT TO LEGISLATE. POLICY DEVELOPMENT: PREPARING THE LEGISLATION. TAKING THE BILL THROUGH PARLIAMENT. AFTER ASSENT. LEGISLATION: THE APPLIED EMPIRICAL REALITY. APPENDIX.ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.

1. Growth and Change in Santa Ana. 2. Overcrowding and Land-Use Policy. 3. Neighborhood Protest and Community-Based Planning. 4. Lessons and Conclusions.

1. Introduction. 2. Transnationalism. 3. Chinese transnationalism in North America. 4. Chinese enterprise in Canada. 5. Chinese small transnational businesses in Vancouver. 6. Conclusion.

1. Introduction. 2. E-Government: Theory and Practice. 3. Implementation of Municipal E-Government: Adoption and Evolution of E-Government at the Municipal Level. 4. Municipal E-Government and Institutional Characteristics. 5. Conclusions and Future Studies.

1. Abstract. 2. Introduction and backround. 3. An assessment of the post-1994 changes. 4. Centralisation of structures and public policy. 5. Conclusion.

This paper offers a critique of the concept of governance as networks. Using the complementary concept of regime governance, it argues that networks are not the primary mode of governance in the politics of urban regeneration in the UK. Drawing on primary and secondary material, it is argued that Central Government is becoming more influential in the local policy arena. In the "mix" of market, hierarchy and network, hierarchy is more pervasive than network. It is therefore argued that partnerships should be treated as a distinct mode of governance. These conclusions demostrate that despite the fashion for copying urban policies from the USA, local politics in the UK remain very different. Ironically, the transfer of policies developed in the USA has tended to entrench divergent practices and outcomes. The UK does not, therefore, appear to be moving towards the US model of regime politics. It is concluded that the partnership and network/regime models of governance should be subjected to rigorous comparative studies.