Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

A POLITICAL EXPLANATION OF POLICY SELECTION: THE CASE OF URBAN SCHOOL REFORM

HESS, FREDERICK M.

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 3/1999, pág. 459

Sumario
1. Previous Reserch. 2. Methodology. 3. A politicalexplanation of reform selection. 4. The policy areas:Comparing SBM and Scheduling reforms. 5. Testing a Politicaltheory of policy selection. 6. Conclusion.

A VIEW OF THEIR OWN: WOMEN'S COMMITTEE LEADERSHIP STYLES AND STATE LEGISLATURES.

SIMON ROSENTHAL, CINDY

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 4/1997, pág. 585

Sumario
1. Gender and legislatures. 2. Methods and data. 3. The profile of committee chairs. a) The sample as a whole. b) Sex differences by legislature. 4. Measures of committee leadership style. a) Leadership motivation. b) Inclusive behaviors. 5. Results of categorical analysis. 6. Multivariate analysis.

A WEB OF INTERESTS: STALEMATE ON THE DISPOSAL OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL

KATZ, JONATHAN L.

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 3/2001, pág. 456

Sumario
1. Literature of institutions, interests, and SNFdisposal policy. a) Literature on environmental policy,nuclear politics, and SNF disposal. 2. Stalemate over SNFdisposal. a) What is policy stalemate?. b) The U.S. path tostalemate. 3. Explaining the stalemate. a) The nature of theproblem. b) Explaining the stalemate: the response of thepluralist american political system. c) Officialpolicymakers have few incentives to act. d) Interest groups:many, but no majority. e) The latent trade-off betweenenergy and environment. 4. Resolving the stalemate. 5.Conclusion.

A WISH LIST FOR 21 ST CENTURY ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: DECENTRALIZATION, INTEGRATION, COOPERATION, FLEXIBILITY, AND ENHANCED PARTICIPATION BY CITIZENS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.

WEBER, EDWARD P.

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 1/1998, pág. 185

Sumario
1. The politics of garbage in spokane, Washington. 2. Cooperative intergovernmental policy as an enduring feature of the political landscape. 3. The more things change, the more they remain the same.

ABOLITION OF LEPROSY ISOLATION POLICY IN JAPAN: POLICY TERMINATION THROUGH LEADERSHIP

SATO, HAJIME

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 1/2002, pág. 29

Sumario
1. Leprosy Control Policy in Japan. 2. Discussion. 3. Conclusions.

ADVOCACY COALITIONS, POLICY ENTREPRENEURS, AND POLICY CHANGE

MINTROM, MICHAEL;VERGARI, SANDRA

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 3/1996, pág. 420

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Two models of policymaking. 3. Comparing the models. 4. Explaining education reform in Michigan. 5. Assessing the merits of each interpretation. 6. Conclusion.

AIRPORT PRIVATIZATION: FULL DIVESTITURE AND ITS ALTERNATIVES

TRUITT, LAWRENCE J.;ESLER, MICHAEL

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 1/1996, pág. 100

Sumario
1. The divestitur. 2. Alternative models. 3. Conclusion.

ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE POLITICS IS LOCAL: GRASS-ROOTS ADVOCACY AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN SITING AND CLEANUP DECISIONS

LOWRY, ROBERT C.

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 4/1998, pág. 748

Sumario
1. The demand side: Interest group pluralism andfractured advocacy. 2. The supply side: Public participationin local siting and cleanup decisions. 3. Discussion.

AMERICAN AND CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERALISM: A GAME-THEORETIC ANLYSIS

MARTIN GILLROY, JOHN

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 2/1999, pág. 360

Sumario
1. The prisoner's dilemma and "centralized"federalism in the United States. 2. Chicken and "privileged"federalism in Canada. 3. Environmental federalism: Thefindings of five case studies. 4. Conclusions.

BALANCING PRESERVATION AND LOGGING: PUBLIC LANDS POLICY IN BRITISH COLUMBIA AND THE WESTERN UNITED STATES

BRYNER, GARY

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 2/1999, pág. 307

Sumario
1. The evolution of U.S. forest policy. 2. Anoverview of BC forest policy. 3. Explaining U.S. andCanadian forest policies. 4. Assessing U.S. and Canadiantimber policy. 5. Reversing policy failures.

Página 1 de 15