Síguenos en los medios sociales
STIVERS, CAMILLA
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 1/2005, pág. 26 a 41
1. PROGRESSIVE ERA VISIONS. 2. PHILOSOPHICAL CRITIQUE: ARENDT AND OTHERS. 3. HOME AND DEMOCRACY. 4. FEMINISM AND HOME. 5. HOME AS ONTOLOGY. 6. HOME AND PUBLIC LIFE. 7. HOME AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. 8. CONCLUSION.
ADMINISTRATION ETHICS AND JUDGMENTS OF UTILITY: RECONCILING THE COMPETING THEORIES
BRADY, F. NEIL;WOLLER, GARY M.;YOUNG UNIVERSITY, BRIGHAM
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 3/1996, pág. 309
DIAMOND, MICHAEL A.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 3/1997, pág. 228
1. Literature review: A psychoanalytic perspective. 2. Overview of the problem. 3. U.S. general accounting office report on the U.S. postal service. 4. Social psychodynamic factors in violence and aggression at work: the toxic mix of oppressive cultures and persecutory identities. 5. The persecutory organizational identity. 6. Conclusion:...
1. Literature review: A psychoanalytic perspective. 2. Overview of the problem. 3. U.S. general accounting office report on the U.S. postal service. 4. Social psychodynamic factors in violence and aggression at work: the toxic mix of oppressive cultures and persecutory identities. 5. The persecutory organizational identity. 6. Conclusion: Transforming oppressive cultures and persecutory identities at work.
ADMINISTRATIVE INNOVATION AMONG OHIO LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS
GIANAKIS, GERASIMOS A.;MCCUE, CLIFFORD P.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 3/1997, pág. 270
1. Adoption of management tools and techniques. 2. Methodology. 3. Findings. a) Diffusion. b) Determinants. c) Outcomes. 4. Conclusion.
ADVANCING PRAXIS. CONNECTING CRITICAL THEORY WITH PRACTICE IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
ZANETTI, LISA A.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 2/1997, pág. 145
1. Philosophical foundations: Critical theory and the pragmatism of habermas. 2. Implications of the reliance on discourse theory. 3. Suggestions for a new direction in critical public administration research. 4. On critical theory and praxis in public administration.
AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE OF PRIVATIZATION: THE NEED TO BALANCE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
PRIZZIA, ROSS
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 3/2003, pág. 316 a 330
1. THE IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION BY CONTRACT 2. IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION BY SALE 3. MITIGATING FACTORS IN PRIVATIZATION 4. RELEVANT INDICATORS OF SOCIAL PERFORMANCE 5. IMPORTANCE OF INCLUDING SOCIAL FACTORS 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 7. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH
APPLES AND ORANGES?: COMPARING THE ATTITUDES OF PUBLIC POLICY VERSUS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION STUDENTS
DE SOTO, WILLIAM;OPHEIM, CYNTHIA;TAJALLI, HASSAN
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 1/1999, pág. 77
1. The rise of policy schools. 2. Hypotheses. a) Psychological Dispositions. b) Socialization Through the Curricula. 3. Data and Methods. 4. Findings. 5. Discussion. 6. Notes. 7. References.
APPRAISING EMOTION WORK DETERMINING WHETHER EMOTIONAL LABOR IS VALUED IN GOVERNMENT JOBS
MASTRACCI, SHARON H; NEWMAN, MEREDITH A; GUY, MARY E.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 2/2006, pág. 123 a 138
1. WHAT IS EMOTIONAL LABOR? 2. LITERATURE REVIEW. 3. JOBS AND EMOTIONAL LABOR. 3. METHOD. 4. FINDINGS FROM ANALYZING PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL INSTRUMENTS. 5. PATTERNS REVEALED. 6. CONCLUSIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH. 7. NOTES 8. REFERENCES.
ARE WE ALL TOUCHING THE SAME CAMEL? EXPLORING A MODEL OF PARTICIPATION IN BUDGETING.
FRANKLIN, AIMEE L. Y EBDON, CAROL
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 2/2005, pág. 168 a 185
1. NORMATIVE CONCLUSIONS REGARDING CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN BUDGETING. 1.1. CITY STRUCTURE. 1.2. CITIZEN PARTICIPANTS. 1.3. MECHANISMS FOR PARTICIPATION. 1.4. PARTICIPATION PROCESS. 1.5. DETERMINING EFFECTS. 2. TESTING THE MODEL ON TWO CASES: BURLINGTON, IOWA AND TOPEKA, KANSAS. 2.1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN BURLINGTON. 2.2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION...
1. NORMATIVE CONCLUSIONS REGARDING CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN BUDGETING. 1.1. CITY STRUCTURE. 1.2. CITIZEN PARTICIPANTS. 1.3. MECHANISMS FOR PARTICIPATION. 1.4. PARTICIPATION PROCESS. 1.5. DETERMINING EFFECTS. 2. TESTING THE MODEL ON TWO CASES: BURLINGTON, IOWA AND TOPEKA, KANSAS. 2.1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN BURLINGTON. 2.2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN TOPEKA. 3. ANALYSIS OF THE FACTORS AND VARIABLES. 3.1 CITY STRUCTURE 3.2. CITIZEN PARTICIPANTS. 3.3. MECHANISMS. 3.4. PROCESS. 3.5 EFFECTIVE OUTCOMES. 3.6.THREATS TO VALIDITY. 4. CONCLUSION.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
BARTH, THOMAS J.;ARNOLD, EDDY
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 4/1999, pág. 332
1. The lens of AI. 2. Responsiveness. 3. Judgment.4. Accountability. 5. Summarizing: Potential benefits anddangers of AI for public administration. 6. Benefits of AI.7. Dangers of AI. 8. Conclusion.
ASSESSING ADMINISTRATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY. RESULTS FROM A NATIONAL SURVEY
WANG, XIAOHU
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 3/2002, pág. 350 a 370
I. FRAMEWORK. II. METHODOLOGY. III. FINDINGS. IV. CONCLUSION.
ASSESSING LOCAL GOVERNMENT SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICIES
REESE, LAURA A.; LINDENBERG, KAREN E.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 3/2002, pág. 295 a 311
I. MODEL SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY. II. METHODOLOGY. III. SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICIES. IV. POLICY CRITIQUE AND RECOMMENDATIONS. V. CONCLUSION. VI. APPENDIX.
ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF SOLID WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAMS OVER TIME
FEIOCK, RICHARD C.;GRAHAM KALAN, LESLEY
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 1/2001, pág. 22
1. Explaining recycling success. 2. Analysis. 3.Conclusions.
STREIB, GREGORY D.;POISTER, THEODORE H.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 2/1999, pág. 107
1. Assessing performance measurement efforts. 2.Methodology. 3. Findings. 4. Discussion.
ATTEMPTING NON-INCREMENTAL BUDGET CHANGE IN OREGON: AN EXERCISE IN POLICY SHARING
SIMONSEN, WILLIAM;JOHNSTON, NANCY;BARNETT, RUSSELL
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 2/1996, pág. 231
1. Introduction. 2. Models of Governmental Decision Making. a) Rational and Incremental Decision Making. b) Bringing Democracy into the Process. 3. Lessons from the Literature. a) Use a Rigorous Research Design. b) Provide Adequate Resources. c) Be inclusive. d) Make the Process ...
AVALANCHES AND INCREMENTALISM. MAKING POLICY AND BUDGETS IN THE UNITED STATES
TRUE, JAMES L.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 1/2000, pág. 3
1. Budgeting and the failure of pureincrementalism. 2. Understanding policy making today. 3. Thepunctual equilibrium theory of policy making. 4. Theavalanche budget model. 5. Data, analysis, and findings. 6.Conclusion.
AVOIDING THE ISSUE. RACISM AND ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
ALEXANDER, JENNIFER
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 4/1997, pág. 343
1. The social construction of race and racism. 2. The role of race within public administration. 3. Administrative responsibility and its source in customary morality. a) The responsible administrator as neutral technician. b) The responsible administrator as delegate. c) The responsible administrator as enlightened trustee. 4. Administrative...
1. The social construction of race and racism. 2. The role of race within public administration. 3. Administrative responsibility and its source in customary morality. a) The responsible administrator as neutral technician. b) The responsible administrator as delegate. c) The responsible administrator as enlightened trustee. 4. Administrative responsibility reconceived. 5. Conclusion.
BARRIERS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT-CAPACITY IN NIGERIA
MEAD, TIMOTHY D.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 2/1996, pág. 159
1. Introduction. 2. Barriers to Local-Government Area Capacity in Nigeria. a) Instability in Local Government. b) Financial Barriers to Local Capacity. c) Traditional Rulers and local Discretion. d) Absence of a Tradition of Accommodation Between Elected and Professional Officials. e) Short-Term Perspectives. 3. Prospects for Local-Government...
1. Introduction. 2. Barriers to Local-Government Area Capacity in Nigeria. a) Instability in Local Government. b) Financial Barriers to Local Capacity. c) Traditional Rulers and local Discretion. d) Absence of a Tradition of Accommodation Between Elected and Professional Officials. e) Short-Term Perspectives. 3. Prospects for Local-Government Capacity in Nigeria.
BETTER, FASTER, STRONGER: GOVERNMENT REINVENTION IN THE 1990S
DURST, SAMANTHA L.;NEWELL, CHARLDEAN
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 1/1999, pág. 61
1. Outline of research design. 2. Characteristics of respondents. 3. What kinds of organizations have pursued reinvention?. 4. What actions have been taken under the mantle of reinvention?. 5. Who/what prompted the reinvention activities?. a) Have the reinvention efforts been successful?. 6. Summary and conclusions. 7. Notes. 8. References.
BEYOND IDEALISM. DEMOCRACY AND ETHICS REFORM
MALETZ, DONALD J.;HERBEL, JERRY
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 1/2000, pág. 19
1. Ethics in the service of democracy? 2. Theoffice of government ethics. 3. The ethic project in theStates. 4. Ethics in Congress. 5. Some costs of ethicsreform. 6. The limited scope of ethics enforcement. 7.Ethics controls versus effective performance. 8. Ethics anddemocratic politics.
BOARD PRACTICES OF ESPECIALLY EFFECTIVE AND LESS EFFECTIVE LOCAL NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
HERMAN, ROBERT D.;RENZ, DAVID O.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 2/2000, pág. 146
1. Board practices, board effectiveness, andorganizational effectiveness. 2. Theoretical perspective oneffectiveness. 3. Sample and method. 4. Results. 5.Conclusions and implications.
KLINGNER, DONALD E.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 3/1996, pág. 387
1. The American Bureaucracy. 2. Bureaucratic dynamics. 3. How Do public Managers Manage? Bureaucratic Constraints, Organizational Culture and the Potential for Reform. 4. Responsibility AS Paradox: A Critique of Rational. 5. Leadership of Public Bureaucracies: The Administrator as Conservator. 6. Public Management as Arts, Science, and Profession....
1. The American Bureaucracy. 2. Bureaucratic dynamics. 3. How Do public Managers Manage? Bureaucratic Constraints, Organizational Culture and the Potential for Reform. 4. Responsibility AS Paradox: A Critique of Rational. 5. Leadership of Public Bureaucracies: The Administrator as Conservator. 6. Public Management as Arts, Science, and Profession. 7. The New Effective Public Manager. 8. Managing Chaos and Complexity in Govermment.
KLINGNER, DONALD E.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 3/1996, pág. 396
1. The Environmental Promise of Democratic Deliberation. 2. Civic Environmental Promise of Democratic Deliberation. 3. Environmental Politics and Policy.
BUDGET CHANGE IN GEORGIA COUNTIES. EXAMINING PATTERNS AND PRACTICES
LU, HAORAN; FACER II, REX L.
ARPA. THE AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC AMINISTRATION, n.º 1/2004, pág. 67
1. BUDGET CHANGE AND ORGANIZATION CHANGE. 2. RESEARCH DESIGN. 3. DISCUSSION. 4. CONCLUSION.
