Síguenos en los medios sociales
A LOOK AT THE SECOND GENERATION OF BLACK ELECTED OFFICIALS IN FLORIDA
BUTTON, JAMES;RICHARDS, SCOTT;BETHUNE, EVELYN
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/1998, pág. 181
1. Review of the literature. 2. Methodology. 3.Results. a) Barriers to effective representation. b)Explanations of black effectiveness. 4. Conclusion.
A REASSESSMENT OF CITY/COUNTY CONSOLIDATION: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS
FEIOCK,RICHARD C.;CARR, JERED B.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/1997, pág. 166
1. Economic development consequences ofconsolidation. 2. Research design and data description. 3.Analysis. 4. Conclusion.
A REASSESSMENT OF CITY/COUNTY CONSOLIDATION: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS
FEIOCK, RICHARD C.;CARR, JERED B.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/1997, pág. 166
1. Economic development consequences of consolidation. 2. Research design and data description. 3. Analysis. 4. Conclusion.
MILLER, EDWARD ALAN
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 1/2004, pág. 35 a 58
1. POLICY CONTENT STUDIES: EXPLAINING VARIATION IN EXPENDITURES AND OTHER CHARACTERISTICS. 2. DIFFUSION AND INNOVATION STUDIES: EXPLAINING VARIATION IN DISCRETE POLICY ADOPTIONS. 3. THE STATE OF COMPARATIVE STATE POLICY RESEARCH: MISSING INGREDIENTS AND MISSED OPPORTUNITIES. 4. CONCLUSION.
AFTER THE ELECTION: HOW DO GOVERNING BOARDS BECOME EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS?
CARLSON, MARGARET S.;DAVIDSON, ANNE S.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/1999, pág. 190
1. Special issues in city-county boards that makeeffective group development more challenging. 2. Importanceof the early period in a board's development. 3.Intervention methodology. 4. Using a group effectivenessmodel. 5. Steps of the intervention. 6. What specificresults are achieved?. 7. Future research.
AGENCY STRATEGIES AND DETERMINANTS OF AGENCY SUCCESS UNDER REDIRECTION IN GEORGIA
DOUGLAS, JAMES W.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 1/1999, pág. 31
1. Methodology. 2. Agency strategies: theliterature. 3. Redirection in Georgia. 4. Agency strategiesunder redirection. 5. Determinants of agency success underredirection. 6. Summary and conclusions.
AIDS ORPHANS IN THE YEAR 2000: A MODEL FOR THE ECONOMIC IMPACT ON A STATE FOSTER CARE SISTEM
PARSONS, SHARON;PRITCHARD, ANITA;RUTLEDGE, ROBERT
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 1/1997, pág. 27
1. Methodology. 2. Results. 3. Discussion.
ALTERNATIVE DEBT FINANCING MECHANISMS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
JOHNSON, CRAIG L.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 2/1996, pág. 78
1. Local economic development Debt financing alternatives. 2. Local option income taxes. 3. Economic development income tax (EDIT). 4. Property tax increment (PTI). 5. Economic development lease rental (EDLR) Bonds. 6. Empirical investigation. 7. Discussion of the variables.
AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE HURDLES TO GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM SUCCESS IN LOCAL GOVERNMMENT
MAUREEN BROWN, MARY
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/1996, pág. 193
1. Geographic Information Systems: An Overview. 2. Obstacles to GIS Success. 3. Methods. 4. Findings. 5. Conclusion.
ANNEXATION: A WINNER-TAKE-ALL PROCESS?
EDWARDS, MARY
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/1999, pág. 221
1. Annexation Research. 2. Research methods. 3.Case study results. 4. Proportional valuation method. 5. Percapita multiplier method. 6. The case study method. 7.Estimates of shared revenues. 8. The fiscal impacts ofannexation. 9. "Winners" versus "Losers". 10. Limitationsof the research.
NYHAN, RONALD C.;MARTIN, LAWRENCE L.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 1/1999, pág. 18
1. Comparative performance assessment. 2. Dataenvelopment analysis. 3. Study design. 4. Data Analysis. 5. Summary and conclusion.
AT WHAT PRICE?. COSTS OF FEDERAL MANDATES SINCE THE 1980S
RIDLEN RAY, MARCELLA;CONLAN, TIMOTHY J.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 1/1996, pág. 7
ATTITUDES TOWARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT: A COMPARISON OF TWO WEST TEXAS CITIES
SOMMA, MARK;NIKOLAI, SCOTT;SKOPEK, TRACY
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 2/1999, pág. 135
1. Environmental opinion. 2. Studying theeconomic-environmental balance. 3. Theorizing publicconfidence. 4. Data and measurement. 5. Conclusion.
BANS ON EXECUTING THE MENTALLY RETARDED: AN EVENT HISTORY ANALYSIS OF STATE POLICY ADOPTION.
CRAIG F.EMMERT Y CAROL ANN TRAUT.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 2/2003, pág. 112 a 122
I.ANALYSIS OF STATE POLICY ADOPTION. II.DATA AND METHODS. III.FINDINGS. IV.CONCLUSION.
DUNCOMBRE, WILLIAM;WONG, WILSON
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/1998, pág. 165
...
1. Comparing tools for assessing regional economicimpacts. a) Simple traditional methods. b) Moresophisticated methods. 2. Use of sophisticated regionalmodels in practice. a) Survey of the literature. b)Influence of results. 3. An integrated framework forevaluation. a) Technical factors. b) Organizational factors.c) Political factors. 4. Conclusion.
CAMPAIGN SPENDING IN STATE LEGISLATIVE PRIMARY ELECTIONS
HOGAN, ROBERT E.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/1999, pág. 214
1. Data. 2. Variations in primary spending. 3.Explaining variations in spending. 4. Conclusion.
CHANGING STATE-LOCAL FISCAL RELATIONS AND SCHOOL FINANCE IN KANSAS: PURSUING EQUITY
JOHNSTON, JOCELYN M.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 1/1998, pág. 26
1. Equity and aid formulas: Theoreticalconsiderations. 2. The Kansas reform. a) The pre-reformsystem. b) Major features of the reform. c) State-localtensions. d) Interdistrict education cost variations. 3.Implications for state-local relations. 4. In conclusion.
CHARLOTTE: A MODEL FOR MARKET-DRIVEN PUBLIC-SECTOR MANAGEMENT
JURKIEWICZ, CAROLE L.; BOWMAN, JAMES S.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/2002, pág. 205 a 213
I. The Charlotte Experience. 1. Create Clarity of Purpose. 2. Create Consequences for Performance. 3. Put the Customer in the Driver's Seat. 4. Shift Control Away from the Top and Center. 5. Create an Entrepreneurial Culture. II. Lessons. III. Cautions. IV. Conclusion.
CHARTER SCHOOLS AS A STATE POLICY INNOVATION: ASSESSING RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
MINTROM, MICHAEL;VERGARI, SANDRA
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 1/1997, pág. 43
1. The Charter Schools Concept. 2. Variations in Charter Scool Laws. 3. Discussion and Conclusion.
CITIES IN STATE POLITICS: VIEWS OF MAYORS AND MANAGERS
DE SOTO, WILLIAM
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/1995, pág. 188
1. Previous research. 2. Research questions and data. 3. What are municipal interests?. 4. Are municipal interests cohesive?. 5. How are municipal interests represented in state politics?. 6. How receptive are states to municipal interests?. 7. Conclusion.
CITIZEN GROUPS IN BIG CITY POLITICS.
CHRISROPHER A. COOPER Y ANTHONY J.NOWNES.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 2/2003, pág. 102 a 111
I.THE LITERATURE. II.DATA AND METHODS. III.FINDINGS. IV.CONCLUSION.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL POLITICS: EVIDENCE FROM NEW ENGLAND TOWN MEETINGS.
DESANTIS, VICTOR S; HILL, DAVID.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/2004, pág. 166 a 172
1. UNDERSTANDING TOWN MEETING PARTICIPATION. 2. DATA AND METHODS. 3. DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS. 4. CONCLUSION.
CITY GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES: AN ATTEMPT AT CLARIFICATION
DESANTIS, VICTOR S.;RENNER, TARI
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 2/2002, pág. 95
1. An Overview of Forms of Municipal Government. 2. Creating a New Typology: Methods and Analysis. 3. Identification of Subcategories of City Government Forms. 4. City Forms of Government and Reformed Electoral Systems. 5. Conclusion.
CITY-COUNTY GOVERNMENT AND PROMISES OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A TALE OF TWO CITIES
CARR, JERED B.; BAE, SANG-SEOK; LU, WENJUE
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 3/2006, pág. 131 a 141
1. PROMISES OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: THE NEW "IT" STRATEGY. 2. LINKING CITY-COUNTY GOVERNMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS. 3. ANALYSIS. 4. FINDINGS. 5. CONCLUSION.
CLASSIFYING STATE APPROACHES TO ANNEXATION
PALMER, JAMIE L.;LINDSEY, GREG
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW, n.º 1/2001, pág. 60
1. Classifying Annexation Procedures. 2.Sengstock's Typology. 3. Other Classification Schemes. 4.Justifications for Annexation procedures. 5. Effects ofAnnexation Procedures. 6. Reclassifying AnnexationProcedures. 7. The Findings. 8. A Corroborative Survey. 9.Observations and Conclusions.
