Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

HUMAN CLONING AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/1998, pág. 2348

Sumario
1. Scientific, ethical, and political background. 2. The liberty interest in human cloning. 3. State interests. 4. Conclusion.

IN MEMORIAN: LOUIS LOSS

CLARK, ROBERT C.;KROLL, MILTON P.;SELIGMAN, JOEL

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/1998, pág. 2135

IN TRIBUTE: CHARLES HAMILTON HOUSTON

CARTER, ROBERT L.;COLEMAN, WILLIAM T. JR.;GREENBERG, JACK

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/1998, pág. 2149

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMPACTS IN NATIVE AMERICAN LAW: MODELS FOR EXPANDED USAGE

Harvard Law Review, n.º 4/1999, pág. 922

Sumario
1. What are tribal-state compacts?. a) The legalauthority to compact. b) The current scope of tribal-statecompacts. 2. The benefits and drawbacks of compacts. a)Benefits of negotiated compacts. b) Drawbacks of negotiatedcompats. c) A compromise solution. 3. The promise of modelcompacts. a) Evaluating compacts. b) The desirability ofmodel compacts. c) Challenges inherent in formulating modelcompacts.

INTERNATIONAL LAW AS AN INTERPRETIVE FORCE IN FEDERAL INDIAN LAW

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/2003, pág. 1751

Sumario
I. INTRODUCTION. II. THE DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORKS. III. INTERNATIONAL LAW'S ROLE IN FEDERAL INDIAN LAW. IV. CONCLUSION.

INTERNATIONAL LAW, U.S. WAR POWERS, AND THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM

GOODMAN, RYAN; JINKS, DEREK

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2005, pág. 2653

Sumario
I. THE SCOPE OF GWOT: DEFINING "ENEMY COMBATANTS". II. TACTICS IN GWOT: DETENTION AND MILITARY COMMISSIONS. III. CONCLUSION.

INTRATEXTUALISM

REED AMAR, AKHIL

Harvard Law Review, n.º 4/1999, pág. 748

Sumario
1. Cases and commentaries. a) Cases. b)Commentaries. 2. Theory. a) The distinctiveness ofintratextualism. b) The types of intratextualism. c) Somestrengths of intratextualism. d) Some weaknesses ofintratextualism. 3. Cases again. a) Morrison and Starr. b)Free speech. c) Boerne.

IS INTERNATIONAL LAW REALLY STATE LAW?.

HONGJU KOH, HAROLD

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/1998, pág. 1824

Sumario
1. Bradley and goldsmith's proposal. 2. History and doctrine. 3. Separation of powers. 4. Federalism. 5. Democracy and the legitimacy of current international human rights litigation. 6. Conclusion.

JUDICIAL APPROACHES TO DIRECT DEMOCRACY

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2005, pág. 2748

Sumario
I. WHY DIRECT DEMOCRACY DESERVES SPECIAL TREATMENT. II. JUDICIAL RESPECT FOR DIRECT DEMOCRACY?. III. JUDICIAL SUSPICION OF DIRECT DEMOCRACY?. IV. TOWARD A NEW MODEL OF INTERPRETATION AND REVIEW. CONCLUSION.

JURISDICTION AND THE RULE OF LAW AFTER THE 1996 IMMIGRATION ACT

NEUMAN, GERALD L.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2000, pág. 1963

Sumario
1. Historical and Constitutional Background. 2. The1996 Judicial Review Provisions in the Courts: a ProgressReport. 3. Comments and Future Directions. 4. Conclusion.

Página 9 de 25