Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

FIRST PRINCIPLES OF CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: A MISTAKE?

REED AMAR, AKHIL

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/1999, pág. 680

Sumario
1. The major contributions of amar's "First Principles". a) Careful criticism of the status quo. b) The allure of "First Principles". c) The importance of constitutional theory. 2. The flip-side: Matching Weaknesses of amar's first principles". a) The sharp eyes do not turn inward. b) Inconsistencies from the Ground Up. c) Solipsism and amar's "moosetake". 3. Whither "Reconceptualization"?.

FOREWORD: FASHIONING THE LEGAL CONSTITUTION: CULTURE, COURTS, AND LAW.

POST, ROBERT C.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 1/2003, pág. 4 a 112

FOREWORD: IMPLEMENTING THE CONSTITUTION

FALLON, RICHARD H.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 1/1997, pág. 56

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Tests and the Constitution. 3. Varieties of doctrinal tests. 4. The relative prominence of differente kinds of tests. 5. The significance of doctrine in the supreme court: The ordinary and the extraordinary in constitutional adjudication. 6. Reasonable disagreement and the judicial role. 7. Conclusion.

FOREWORD: THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF DEMOCRATIC POLITICS

PILDES, RICHARD H.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 1/2004, pág. 28

Sumario
I. INTRODUCTION. II. COMPETITION, RIGHTS, AND EQUALITY. A. STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS. B. RIGHTS AND EQUALITY. III. DISTRICT, REPRESENTATION, PARTIES, AND FINANCING. A. THREATS TO POLITICAL COMPETITION: DOCTRINAL AND INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSES. B. THE LIMITS OF EQUALITY MODELS: COURTS AND POLITICAL REPRESENTATION. C. THE LIMITS OF INDIVIDUAL AND ASSOCIATIONAL RIGHTS MODELS: POLITICAL PARTIES AND POLITICAL COMPETITION. D. DEMOCRACY OR DISTRUST? REDESIGN OF DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS VERSUS INCUMBENT SELF-ENTRENCHMENT. IV. CONCLUSION.

FOREWORD: THE NEW CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER AND THE CHASTENING OF CONSTITUTIONAL ASPIRATION

TUSHNET, MARK

Harvard Law Review, n.º 1/1999, pág. 29

Sumario
1. The executive and legislature in the newconstitutional order. 2. The supreme court in the newconstitutional order. 3. Conclusion: The sources of the newconstitutional order.

FUSION CANDIDACIES, DISAGGREGATION, AND FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/1996, pág. 1302

Sumario
1. Confusion over fusion and disaggregation: The circuit split and existing commentary. 2. A constitutional argument for fusion that is based on the rights of voters. 3. Applications and complications. 4. Conclusion.

GILDEON'S PROMISE UNFULFILLED: THE NEED FOR LITIGATED REFORM OF INDIGENT DEFENSE

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2000, pág. 2062

Sumario
1. Gideon's Promise Unfulfilled. 2. The Case forInstitutional Reform Litigation. 3. The Opportunities forLitigated Reform of Indigent Defense. 4. Challenges toFuture Reform Litigation. 5. Conclusion: Changing the Termsof the Debate.

GLOBALIZATION, TAX COMPETITION, AND THE FISCAL CRISIS OF THE WELFARE STATE

AVI-YONAH, REUVEN S.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/2000, pág. 1573

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. International tax competitionand the taxation of capital. 3. The problem of taxcompetition from a global normative perspective. 4. Thecosts and benefits of tax competition from each country'sperspective. 5. Solutions. 6. Conclusion.

GOVERNMENT TORT LIABILITY.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/1998, pág. 2009

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. The FTCA, Bivens actions, and section 1983. a) The federal tort claims act. b) Bivens suits. c) Section 1983. 3. Policy rationales of public tort law. 4. Proposals for reform. a) Liability for government violations of federal law. b) Individual official liability. c) Liability for government violations of state law. d) Financial concerns. 5. Conclusion.

HERCULES, HERBERT, AND AMAR: THE TROUBLE WITH INTRATEXTUALISM

VERMEULE, ADRIAN;YOUNG, ERNEST A.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/2000, pág. 730

Sumario
1. What is "Intratextualism"?. 2. Hércules'Constitution: coherence and constitutional obligation. 3.Judging with Herbert: intratextualism and second-bestconstitutional interpretation. 4. Conclusion.

Página 8 de 25