Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

EDUCATION LAW - SCHOOL FUNDING - NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT CRITICIZES QUALITY EDUCATION ACT OF 1990. - ABBOTT V. BURKE, 643 A.2D 575 (N.J. 1994)

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/1995, pág. 781

EDUCATION LAW - TITLE IX - ELEVENTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT TITLE IX DOES NOT APPLY TO PEER SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN FEDERALLY FUNDED SCHOOLS

MONROE, DAVIS V.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 2/1997, pág. 597

EMPIRE-BUILDING GOVERMENT IN COSTITUTIONAL LAW

J. LEVINSON, DARYL

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/2005, pág. 915 a 972

Sumario
1. INTRODUCTION. 2. EMPIRE-BUILDING. A) CORPORATE MANAGERS AND DICTATORS. B) DEMOCRATIC REPRESENTATIVES. C) BUREAUCRATS. D) JURISDICTION, GROWTH, AND EMPIRE. 3. FEDERALISM. A) POLITICAL SAFEGUARDS. B) JURISDITIONAL COMPETITION. 4. SEPARATION OF POWERS. A) CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT. B) COURTS. 5. REMEDIES. A) MONETARY DAMEGES AND SORVEREIGN IMMUNITY. B) JUST COMPENSATION FOR TAKINGS. 6. CONCLUSION: AGENCY AND FACTION.

EMPTY VOTES IN JURY DELIBERATIONS

TAYLOR-THOMPSON, KIM

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/2000, pág. 1261

Sumario
Introduction. 1. The nature of majority rule. 2.The racial and gender effects of majority rule. 3.Constitutional and policy implication of the gender andracial effects of majority rule. 4. Conclusion.

ESTOPPING THE MADNESS AT THE PTO: IMPROVING PATENT ADMINISTRATION TRHOUGH PROSECUTION HISTORY ESTOPPEL

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/2003, pág. 2164

Sumario
I. REFORMING PATENT ADMINISTRATION. II. WHAT IS OPTIMAL SORTING?. III. PROSECUTION HISTORY ESTOPPEL AS A MECHANISM FOR OPTIMAL SORTING. IV. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DOCTRINE OF PROSECUTION HISTORY ESTOPPEL.

EUCLID LIVES: THE SURVIVAL OF PROGRESSIVE JURISPRUDENCE

HAAR, CHARLES M.;ALLAN WOLF, MICHAEL

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2002, pág. 2158

Sumario
I. Introduction: continuing down the wrong path. II. Two divided Courts. III. Five questions the Court should still ask. IV. Progressive meanings. V. Kernel and husk.

EXECUTING THE TREATY POWER

ROSENKRANZ, NICHOLAS QUINN

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/2005, pág. 1867 a 1938

Sumario
1. ENUMERATION AND THE TREATY POWER. 2. OF TREATIES AND THEIR STATUTES. 3. TEXT AND STRUCTURE. A) THE TREATY CLAUSE AND THE NECESSARY AND PROPER CLAUSE. B) EXPANDING THE LEGISLATIVE POWER. C) REDUCING THE LEGISLATIVE POWER. 4. COSTITUTIONAL HISTORY 5. PUBLIC CHOICE AND PRATICAL CONSEQUENCES. A) THE PROSPECT OF BREACH AND THE POSSIBILITY OF AMEDMENT. B) FLEXIBILITY AND INCENTIVES. C) IMPERMISSIBLE MOTIVES. D) STARE DECISIS. 6. CONCLUSION.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES: THE NIXON AND CLINTON CASES

REED AMAR, AKHIL;KUMAR KATYAL, NEAL

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/1995, pág. 701

Sumario
1. Untangling Immunity. a) Expressio Unius? b) Separating the Two Tiers of Immunity. c) Nixon Revisited. 2. Possible Privileges. a) Equitable Tolling. b) Equitable Dismissal. c) The Venue Variant. 3. Conclusion.

EXPLOITATIVE PUBLISHERS, UNTRUSTWORTHY SYSTEMS, AND THE DREAM OF A DIGITAL REVOLUTION FOR ARTISTS

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2001, pág. 2438

Sumario
1. A Marxist history of publishing. a) Theartist-patron relationship in Rome and England. b) The riseof the institutional publisher. c) A digital revolution forartists? 2. Institutional publishers: any redeemingqualities?. a) Distribution in digital media benefitsconsumers. b) Digital gatekeeping: a looser definition ofpublishing. c) Just who is the pirate, anyway?. 3.Untrustworthy systems. 4. Conclusion.

EXPRESSIVE HARMS AND STANDING

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/1999, pág. 1313

Sumario
1. The concept of expressive harm. 2. Standing incases of expressive harm. 3. Reconciling the inconsistenciesin the court's treatment of expressive harms. 4. Conclusion.

Página 6 de 25