Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

DELEGATION WITHOUT ACCOUNTABILITY. POWER WITHOUT RESPONSABILITY: HOW CONGRESS ABUSES THE PEOPLE THROUGH DELEGATION

SCHOENBROD, DAVID

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/1995, pág. 751

DEMOCRACY AND FEMINISM.

HIGGINS, TRACY E.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/1997, pág. 1657

Sumario
1. Democracy, individual will, and the state. a) Agency and Constitutional theory. b) Agency, citizenship, and Equal protection: An example. 2. Feminism and constitutional theory. a) Feminist constitutional critiques. b) Feminist alternatives. 3. Agency and feminist theories of the self. a) Authority and legitimacy of feminist claims. b) Autonomy, social construction, and the limited self (why consent is not enough). c) Distinguishing ontology and advocacy. 4. Citizenship and the problem of incomplete Agency.

DEMOCRACY OR DISTRUST? RESTORING HOME RULE FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE POST-CONTROL BOARD ERA.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/1998, pág. 2045

Sumario
1. A history of the governance of the district of columbia. a) First era of home rule: 1820-1871. b) Second era of home rule: 1973-1995. c) Control board era: 1995-present. 2. Why congress should restore home rule in the post-control board era. a) The american home rule tradition. b) The tradition of support for home rule in the district. c) The weakened rationale for congressional exercise of exclusive jurisdiction over the district. 3. Enhancing the political and fiscal efficacy of district of columbia home rule in the post-control board era.

DEPORTATION, SOCIAL CONTROL, AND PUNISHMENT: SOME THOUGHTS ABOUT WHY HARD LAWS MAKE BAD CASES

KANSTROOM, DANIEL

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2000, pág. 1890

Sumario
1. The Foundational Cases and Two Theories ofDeportation: Regulatory Border Control and Post-Entry SocialControl. 2. The Civil/Criminal and Regulation/PunishmentDistinctions. 3. Two Models.

DESTABILIZATION RIGHTS: HOW PUBLIC LAW LITIGATION SUCCEEDS.

SABEL, CHARLES F.; SIMON, WILLIAM H.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 4/2004, pág. 1015 a 1101

Sumario
1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE PROTEAN PERSISTENCE OF PUBLIC LAW LITIGATION 3, PUBLIC LAW LITIGATION AS DESTABILIZATION RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT 4. THE EXPERIMENTALIST APPROACH AND DOCTRINAL ISSUES 5. CONCLUSION

DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW - THE CIVIL JURY.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/1997, pág. 1409

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. The value of the civil jury. 3. Jury selection and composition. 4. Unshrinking the federal civil jury. 5. The jury's capacity to decide complex civil cases. 6. Jury determination of punitive damages.

DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW- INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/2001, pág. 1943

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. The promises of internationalprosecution. 3. Fair trials and the role of internationalcriminal defense. 4. Definig protected groups under thegenocide convention. 5. Corporate liability for violationsof international human rights law. 6. The internationaljudicial dialogue: When domestic constitutional courtsjoin the conversation.

DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW. ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/1998, pág. 1863

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Changes in prision and crime demographics. 3. Alternatives to incarceration for drug-abusing offenders. 4. Alternative sanctions for female offenders. 5. The legality of innovative alternative sanctions for nonviolent crimes. 6. Alternative punishments: Resistance and inroads.

DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW. THE PATHS OF CIVIL LITIGATION

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/2000, pág. 1752

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. The use of the public nuisancetort against the handgun industry. 3. Problems and proposalsin punitive damages reform. 4. Class action reform: anassesment of recent judicial decisions and legislativeinitiatives. 5. Class auctions: market models for attorneys'fees in class action litigation. 6. ADR, the judiciary, andjustice: Coming to terms with the alternatives.

DEVOLVING WELFARE PROGRAMS TO THE STATES: A PUBLIC CHOICE PERSPECTIVE

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/1996, pág. 1984

Sumario
1. The race to the bottom in the welfare context. 2. Federal Waivers and the current AFDC system. 3. Proposed changes to the welfare system under the republican conference agreement. 4. Potential solutions. 5. Conclusion.

Página 5 de 25