Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

EFFECTS OF UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND SUBSIDIZATION ON MUNICIPAL TAXES AND EXPENDITURES

STUMM, THEODORE J.;KHAN, AMAN

State and Local Government Review, n.º 2/1996, pág. 103

Sumario
1. Earlier Research. 2. Conceptual foundation. 3. Data. 4. Analysis and results. 5. Summary and Conclusions.

ENHANCING EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP IN THE STATES

BEYLE, THAD L.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 1/1995, pág. 18

Sumario
1. The Reawakening of the States. 2. Some Basic Changes in the States. 3. Where Are the States and Their Governors Now?. 4. Executive Branch Powers. a) Administrative Reorganization Authority. b) Appointive Powers. 5. Legislative Branch Relations. a) Budget-Making Power. b) Veto Power. c) Partisan Control. 6. Gubernatorial Powers. a) Tenure Potential. b) Compensation. 7. Leadership is the Key. 8. Assessing Leadership. a) Southern States...

ENVIRONMENTAL VOTING IN THE AMERICAN STATES: A TALE OF TWO INITIATIVES

LYNN GUBER, DEBORAH

State and Local Government Review, n.º 2/2001, pág. 120

Sumario
1. Theory and Methodology. 2. Case Study 1: The1986 California Toxics Initiative. 3. Understanding PublicAttitudes toward Proposition 65. 4. Why Did Proposition 65Succeed?. 5. Case Study 2: The 1992 Massachusetts RecyclingInitiative. 6. Discussion.

EVALUATING STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE REDUCTION POLICY

FOLZ, DAVID H.;PERETZ, JEAN H.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 3/1997, pág. 134

Sumario
1. Methodology. 2. State approaches to voluntary hazardous waste reduction. 3. Tennessee's hazardous waste reductions act. 4. The motivation to reduce hazardous waste. 5. Hazzardous waste reduction practices and effects. 6. How industries characterize their waste reduction efforts. 7. Waste reduction performance. 8. Explaining reduction performance. 9. Environmental management at the crossroads.

EVALUATING STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE REDUCTION POLICY

FOLZ, DAVID H.;PERETZ, JEAN H.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 3/1997, pág. 134

Sumario
1. Methodology. 2. State approaches to voluntaryhazardous waste reduction. 3. Tennessee's hazardous wastereduction act. 4. The motivation to reduce hazardous waste.5. Hazardous waste reduction practices and effects. 6. Howindustries characterize their waste reduction efforts. 7.Waste reduction performance. 8. Explaining reductionperformance. 9. Environmental management at the crossroads.

EXECUTION PHASE BUDGETING IN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: IT'S NOT JUST FOR CONTROL ANYMORE!

THURMAIER, KURT

State and Local Government Review, n.º 2/1995, pág. 102

Sumario
1. The executive budget process. 2. Evolution of budgeteer orientation. 3. A general model of microbudgeting. 4. Multiple rationalities. 5. A field study of local budgeteers. 6. Methodology. 7. Sample. 8. Nonfiscal rationalities in the execution phase. a) Evidence of nonfiscal analysis. b) Social rationality. c) Political rationality. d) Legal rationality. 9. Discussion.

EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP AS AN ENDURING INSTITUTIONAL ISSUE

THOMPSON, FRANK J.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 1/1995, pág. 7

Sumario
1. The External Dimension. 2. Dominance of the Policy Agenda. 3. Veto Points and Supermajority Requirements. 4. Executive Veto Power. 5. The Internal Dimension. 6. Toward Fresh Insight.

EXPLORING BOUNDARIES IN GOVERNANCE: INTERGOVERNMENTAL BOUNDARY AGREEMENTS

TAYLOR, GARY D.; BASSETT, ELLEN M.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 3/2007, pág. 119 a 130

Sumario
1. GOVERNMENT MODEL. 2. GOVERNANCE MODEL. 3. ANNEXATION AND IBAS. 4. THE STUDY. 5. DESCRIBING IBA LEGISLATION. A) CHANGES TO EXISTING BOUNDARIES. B) DETERMINING FUTURE BOUNDARIES. 6. ATTRIBUTES OF IBA LEGISLATION. A) PROCESS ATTRIBUTES. B) CONSIDERATION ATTRIBUTES. 7. FINDINGS. A) PROCESS ATTRIBUTES. B) CONSIDERATION ATTRIBUTES. 8. CONCLUSION.

FRIENDSHIP AND VOTES: THE IMPACT OF INTERPERSONAL TIES ON LEGISLATIVE DECISION MAKING

ARNOLD, LAURA W.;DEEN, REBECCA E.;PATTERSON, SAMUEL C.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 2/2000, pág. 142

Sumario
1. Friendship and roll-call voting. 2.Expectations. 3. The model. 4. Results. 5. Conclusions.

GETTING TO THE TOP: FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SELECTION OF WOMEN TO POSITIONS OF LEADERSHIP IN STATE LEGISLATURES

DEEN. REBECCA E.;LITTLE, THOMAS H.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 2/1999, pág. 123

Sumario
1. Literature Review. 2. Testing Our Ideas. 3. TheResults. 4. Conclusion.

Página 5 de 13