Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - EQUAL PROTECTION - SEVENTH CIRCUIT UPHOLDS FIRE DEPARTMENT PROMOTION QUOTA

Harvard Law Review, n.º 2/1998, pág. 560

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - FOURTH AMENDMENT - SEVENTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT TANDOM SUSPICIONALESS FRUG TESTING OF PARTICIPANTS IN EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES DOES NOT VIOLATE THE FOURTH AMENDMENT

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/1999, pág. 713

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW- RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL-EIGHTH CIRCUIT HOLDS AN ADJUDICATION OF JUVENILE DELINQUENCY TO BE A "PRIOR CONVICTION" FOR THE PURPOSE OF SENTENCE ENHANCE-MENT AT A SUBSEQUENT CRIMINAL PROCEEDING.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 2/2002, pág. 705 a 712

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. CONGRESS IMPOSES NEW RESTICTIONS ON USE OF FUNDS BY THE LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION. OMNIBUS CONSOLIDATED RESCISSIONS AND APPROPRIATIONS

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/1997, pág. 1346

CONSTITUTIONAL RISKS TO EQUAL PROTECTION IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/2001, pág. 2098

Sumario
1. The particularity requirement. a) The reasonsfor particularity. b) Costs. c) Effects. 2. Constitutionalrisk and the remedy problem. a) Sanctions. b) Structuralinjunctions. c) Discretionary guidelines. 3. Conclusion.

CONTROLLING EXECUTIVE POWER IN THE WAR ON TERRORISM

THUSHNET, MARK

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2005, pág. 2673

COPYRIGHT FOR FUNCTIONAL EXPRESSION.

WEINREB, LLOYD L.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/1998, pág. 1149

Sumario
1. Introduction. a) Lotus v. borland. b) The Copyright act. c) Baker v. selden. d) Functional expression. e) "Books" and "Machines". f) Feist publications, inc. v. rural telephone service co. g) Borland reduz. h) The author's right. i) The instrumental argument. 2. Conclusion.

CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW AS FEDERAL COMMON LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THE MODERN POSITION

BRADLEY, CURTIS A.;GOLDSMITH, JACK L.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 4/1997, pág. 816

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Rise of the modern position. 3. Implications of the Modern Position. 4. Critique of the Modern Position. 5. Implications of the Critique.

DARWIN'S NEW BULLDOG.

DWORKIN, RONALD

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/1998, pág. 1718

Sumario
1. Urgent questions. 2. Morality's independence. 3. Whats is "Moral theory"?. 4. The "Strong" thesis. 5. The "Weak" thesis. 6. The new pragmatism.

DEFERENCE TO LEGISLATIVE FACT DETERMINATIONS IN FIRST AMENDMENT CASES AFTER TURNER BROADCASTING

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/1998, pág. 2312

Sumario
1. Doctrinal confusion regarding the scope of review. 2. Argument for deference vs. first amendment norms. 3. Reconciling turner-deference with speech doctrine. 4. Conclusion.

Página 4 de 25