Hemeroteca

Resultados de búsqueda

COMMITTEE INFLUENCE OVER CONTROVERSIAL POLICY: THE REPRODUCTIVE POLICY CASE

NORTON, NOELLE H.

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 2/1999, pág. 203

Sumario

1. The reproductive policy example. 2. Studyingreproductive policymaking in Congress. 3. Conclusions.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF CANADIAN AND AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SYMPOSIUM

RABE, BARRY G.;LOWRY, WILLIAM R.

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 2/1999, pág. 263

Sumario

1. Common Ground. 2. Institutional differences. 3.Theoretical expectations. 4. Conclusion.

COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: MARKET-TYPE INSTRUMENTS IN INDUSTRIALIZED CAPITALIST COUNTRIES.

LOTSPEICH, RICHARD

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 1/1998, pág. 85

Sumario

1. Theory of market instruments. a) Command versus market. b) Variants of market instruments. 2. Practices in five OECD countries. a) France. b) Germany. c) Japan. d) The Netherlands. e) United States. 3. Practice versus theory. a) Politics of environmental regulation. b) Cost-effectiveness of command-and-control. 4. Conclusions. 5. Notes.

COMPARING THREE LENSES OF POLICY CHOICE

ZAHARIADIS, NIKOLAOS

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 3/1998, pág. 434

Sumario

1. Allison and the evaluation of alternativelenses. 2. Illuminating the elements of each framework. a) Units and levels of analysis. b) Three views of collective choice. c) Institutions and procedural rationality. 3. Prediction versus description. 2. Charting a future research agenda.

DEBATING THE DEBATE: LESSONS FROM THE POLICY ANALYSIS OF HEALTH CARE REFORM

FREEDMAN, GRACE R.

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 1/1996, pág. 149

DISCOURSE AND ARGUMENT IN BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WILDERNESS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS

GINGER, CLARE

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 2/2000, pág. 292

Sumario

1. Background. 2. BLM Wilderness EISs asArgumentative Discourse. 3. Implications. 4. Appendix:Research Methods.

DISCOURSE, PARTY, AND POLICY: THE CASE OF ABORTION, 1965-1972

NOSSIFF, ROSEMARY

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 2/1998, pág. 244

Sumario

1. Methodology. 2. Agenda setting and municipal reform. 3. Public discourses. a) Religious discourse. b) Legal discourse. 4. The New York campaign. 5. The Pennsylvania case. 6. Conclusion. 7. Notes. 8. References.

DISTINGUISHING DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES FROM DEVELOPER GIVE-AWAYS: A CRITICAL GUIDE FOR DEVELOPMENT PRACTITIONERS AND CITIZENS.

ODEN, MICHAEL D.;MUELLER, ELIZABETH J.

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 1/1999, pág. 147

Sumario

1. Background: Tax incentives and local economicdevelopment. 2. The central questions for evaluatingproposed tax incentives. 3. Conclusion: Laying thegroundwork for better deals.

DIVIDED GOVERNMENT AND THE RISE OF SOCIAL REGULATION

ROSE, MELODY

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 4/2001, pág. 611

Sumario

1. Incentives. 2. Alternative explanations. 3. Methodology: Coding and the Theory of Public Policy Types. 4. Methodology: The Population of Important Votes. 5. Findings. 6. Analysis and Conclusion.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: BALANCING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERESTS

MACLIN, S. ALEXANDER.

Policy Studies Journal, n.º 1/1999, pág. 79

Página 3 de 15