Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

AUTONOMY, PEACE, AND PUT OPTIONS IN THE MASS TORT CLASS ACTION

NAGAREDA, RICHARD A.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/2002, pág. 747

Sumario
Introduction. I. Situating the mass tort class action. II. Class certification and class settlement structure. III. The plaintiff class put option. Conclusion.

BEYOND REGIONAL GOVERNMENT

FRUG, GERALD E.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/2002, pág. 1763

Sumario
I. The quest for regional government. II. A new relationship for metropolitan cities: ideas from the European Union. III. Conclusion: the politics of regionalism.

BREATHING NEW LIFE INTO PROSECUTORIAL VINDICTIVENESS DOCTRINE

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/2001, pág. 2074

Sumario
1. A doctrine grounded in social realities. 2. Whydo prosecutors act vindictively? 3. The criminal justicesystem since 1980. a) Incentives. b) Opportunity:Prosecutorial leverage. c) Alternatives: What does theprosecutor know and when does he know it? 4. Toward astronger vindictiveness doctrine. 5. Conclusion.

CAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW REGULATE BEHAVIOR? A MODEST PROPOSAL FOR WEAKENING UNCLEAN HANDS

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/2000, pág. 1503

Sumario
1. Introducction: an odd situation and its remedy.2. The idea of compliance in intellectual property. 3. Arecompliance conditions a good idea?. 4. Conclusion.

CHARTING NO MAN'S LAND: APPLYING JURISDICTIONAL AND CHOICE OF LAW DOCTRINES TO INTERSTATE COMPACTS.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/1998, pág. 1991

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. The interstate compact device. 3. Federal jurisdiction and vertical choice of law. a) Supreme court appellate jurisdiction. b) Federal law as the rule of decision and federal question jurisdiction. 4. Evaluating federal jurisdiction ant the use of federal law to construe compacts. 5. Conclusion.

CIBER-RACE

KANG, JERRY

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/2000, pág. 1130

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Race. 3. Cyberspace. 4.Abolition. 5. Integration. 6. Transmutation. 7.Diversification. 8. Conclusion.

CLASS ACTION LITIGATION IN CHINA

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/1998, pág. 1523

Sumario
1. Statutory framework. 2. Class action suits. 3. Litigation as policy: Structural tensions. 4. Control of legal development: The legal profession. 5. Conclusion.

COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN A GLOBAL AGE.

RUTI TEITEL

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2004, pág. 2570 a 2596

Sumario
I.INTRODUCTION. II.THE NEW FUNCTIONALISM IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. III.METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE NEW FUNCTIONALISM. IV. THE DIALOGICAL APPROACH. V. THEORIZING COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION. VI. CONCLUSION.

CONSTITUTIONAL INNOCENCE

MICHAELS, ALAN C.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 4/1999, pág. 828

Sumario
1. Constitutional innocence: an introduction. 2.Constitutional innocence amidst strict liability. 3.Defending constitutional innocence. 4. The impact ofconstitutional innocence. 5. Conclusion.

CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION- NEVADA SUPREME COURT SETS ASIDE A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT REQUIRING A TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY FOR PASSING A TAX INCREASE BECAUSE IT CONFLICTS WITH A SUBSTANTIVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/2004, pág. 972 a 979

Página 3 de 25