Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

ADMINISTRATIVE RULEMAKING: AN OLD AND EMERGING LITERATURE

WEST, WILLIAM

Public Administration Review, n.º 6/2005, pág. 655 a 668

Sumario
-1. RULES AS A FORM OF ADMINISTRATION. -2. THE FORMAL STRUCTURE OF RULEMAKING: TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF ITS SYSTEMIC ROLE. -3. EVALUATING AND REFORMING THE RULEMAKING PROCESS. -4. THE EFFECTS OF NOTICE AND COMMENT: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND BUREAUCRATIC RESPONSIVENESS. -5. THE INFORMAL PROCESS. -6. CONCLUSION. -7. NOTES.

ADVANCING E-GOVERNMENT AT THE GRASSROOTS: TORTOISE OR HARE?

NORRIS, DONALD F.; MOON, M. JAE.

Public Administration Review, n.º 1/2005, pág. 64 a 72

Sumario
1. GUIDING FRAMEWORK. 2. DATA AND METHODS. 3. INPUT DIMENSION. A) ADOPTION. B) AGE OF WEB SITES. 4. IMPACT DIMENSION. 5. BARRIERS TO E-GOVERNMENT. 6. CONCLUSION.

AGENCY DISCRETION AND THE DYNAMICS OF PROCEDURAL REFORM

SPENCE, DAVID B.

Public Administration Review, n.º 5/1999, pág. 425

Sumario
1. Interest groups, procedures, and agencydecisions. 2. Environmental policymaking procedures at theFERC. 3. FERC'S reaction to the scenic hudson decision. 4.FERC'S reaction to NEPA. 5. FERC'S response to ECPA. 6.Conclusion.

AGENCY LEADERS, GENDERED INSTITUTIONS, AND REPRESENTATIVE BUREAUCRACY

SAIDEL, JUDITH R.; LOSCOCCO, KARYN

Public Administration Review, n.º 2/2005, pág. 158

Sumario
I. INTRODUCTION. II. OVERVIEW OF SELECTED STUDIES. III. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. IV. EXPANDED CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. V. DATA AND METHODS. VI. RESULTS. VII. DISCUSSION. VIII. CONCLUSION.

AIRPORT SECUTIRY, HIGH RELIABILITY, AND THE PROBLEM OF RATIONALITY

FREDERICKSON, H. GEORGE;LAPORTE, TODD R.

Public Administration Review, n.º 62/2002, pág. 33

Sumario
1. Comparing the classic Public Administration and the structured redundancy schools. 2. Organizational high reliability. 3. The internal properties of high-reliability organizations. 4. The external properties of high-reliability organizations. 5. The problem of reliability.

AMERICAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND IMPACTS ON INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS

OTOOLE JR., LAURENCE J.;HANF, KENNETH I.

Public Administration Review, n.º 62/2002, pág. 158

Sumario
1. Globalizing governance: an overview. 2. The American variant and an environmental slice. 3. The emerging governance framework: an analytical view. 4. Implications for American public administration. 5. Internationalization and functions of public management. 6. Concluding observations.

AMERICAN VS. EUROPEAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: DOES PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION MAKE THE MODERN STATE, OR DOES THE STATE MAKE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION?

STILMAN II, RICHARD J.

Public Administration Review, n.º 4/1997, pág. 332

Sumario
1. What the Administrative State Tells Us AboutPublic Administration. 2. What the European State Tells UsAbout Public Administration. 3. Four Observations, OfSorts...

AN ACADEMICIAN'S RESPONSE: THE THINKING, LEARNING BUREAUCRACY

SHERWOOD, FRANK P.

Public Administration Review, n.º 2/1996, pág. 154

Sumario
1. The Context. 2. The Enduring Dimensions. 3. Changing Times and Backward Momentum. 4. Conclusion.

AN ASSESSMENT OF RESEARCH ON AMERICAN COUNTIES.

J.EDWIN BENTON

Public Administration Review, n.º 4/2005, pág. 462 a 474

Sumario
I.INTRODUCTION. II.THE RESEARCH AGENDA FOR THE 1990S.AN ASSESSMENT. III.REFLECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS.

AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF INNOVATIONS IN INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF THE GREAT LAKES BASIN

RABE, BARRY G.

Public Administration Review, n.º 4/1996, pág. 372

Sumario
1. Factors Fostering Integration. 2. Support for Alternative Approaches to Controlling Cross-Media Pollution Problems. 3. Opportunities for Cross-Media Integration. a) Integrated Permitting. b) Environmental Impact Assessment. c) Agency Organization. d) Mass Balance. e) Pollution Prevention. 4. Conclusions.

Página 3 de 38