Hemeroteca

Resultados de búsqueda

REINVENTING GOVERNMENT: DOES LEADERSHIP MAKE THE DIFFERENCE?

HENNESSEY, J.THOMAS

Public Administration Review, n.º 6/1998, pág. 522

1. Reinvention is a major initiative of the Clinton administration. 2. The research subject organizations. 3. The four variables. 4. Categorizations. 5. Results.

REINVENTING GOVERNMENT: THE CASE OF NATIONAL SERVICE

LENKOWSKY, LESLIE;PERRY, JAMES L.

Public Administration Review, n.º 4/2000, pág. 298

Sumario

1. Applying Reinvention to National Service. a)Catalytic. b) Competitive. c) Decentralized. d)Results-Oriented. 2. Realities of Reinvention. a) CatalyticIs in the Eye of the Beholder. b) Creating Competition inNon-Market Contexts. c) How Much Decentralization IsEnough?. d) Results of What? For Whom?. 3. Lessons Learned.4. Conclusion.

REINVENTING LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND THE E-GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE

TAT-KEI HO, ALFRED

Public Administration Review, n.º 4/2002, pág. 434

Sumario

1. Introduction. 2. A Paradigm Shift of Public Service Delivery in the Internet Age. 3. Paradigm Shift Reflected in City Web Sites. 4. Paradigm Shift Reflected in an Opinion Survey of Web Masters. 5. Why Did Cities Adopt the Paradigm Shift?. 6. Conclusion.

REINVENTING OR REPACKAGING PUBLIC SERVICES? THE CASE OF COMMUNITY-ORIENTED POLICING

GIANAKIS, GERASIMOS A.;DAVIS, G. JOHN

Public Administration Review, n.º 6/1998, pág. 485

Sumario

1. Issues in community policing. 2. Issues in the organization of law enforcement. 3. Results. 4. Discussion. 5. Conclusion.

REINVENTING THE PROVERBS OF GOVERNMENT

WILLIAMS, DANIEL W.

Public Administration Review, n.º 6/2000, pág. 522

Sumario

1. Proverbs. 2. Old Ideas. 3. The Hazards ofReinventing Government. 4. Is it Really EntrepreneurialGovernment?. 5. Conclusion.

REINVENTION AS REFORM: ASSESSING THE NATIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW

THOMPSON, JAMES R.

Public Administration Review, n.º 6/2000, pág. 508

Sumario

1. Public-Private Differences. 2. Assessing theNational Performance Review. 3. NPR at he Social SecurityAdministration. 4. Alternative Explanations for theShortcomings of NPR. 5. Discussion and Conclusion.

REORGANIZING FOR NATIONAL SECURITY AND HOMELAND SECURITY

NEWMANN, WILLIAM W.

Public Administration Review, n.º 62/2002, pág. 126

Sumario

1. Introduction. 2. The new threat environment. 3. Organizing for homeland security. 4. Rivalries old and new. 5. Conclusion.

REPRESENTATION IN GOVERNMENT BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

MITCHELL, JERRY;COLLEGE, BARUCH

Public Administration Review, n.º 2/1997, pág. 160

Sumario

1. The organization of boards. 2. Theories of representation. 3. Research findings. 4. Conclusion

RESEARCH NOTE: PUBLIC AND PRIVATE MANAGERS' PERCEPTIONS OF RED TAPE

RAINEY, HAL G.;PANDEY, SANJAY;BOZEMAN, BARRY

Public Administration Review, n.º 6/1995, pág. 567

Sumario

1. Red Tape: Definition and Research Issues. 2. Some Models Explaining Red Tape. a) A Goal Ambiguity Hypothesis. b) An Insecurity Hypothesis. c) An Expectancy Hypothesis. 3. Results. a) The Goal Ambiguity Hypothesis. b) Size and Red Tape. c) Sector Differences. d) The ...

RESPONDING TO THE DECLINE IN PUBLIC SERVICE PROFESSIONALISM

SHERWOOD, FRANK P.

Public Administration Review, n.º 3/1997, pág. 211

Sumario

1. The Florida Situation. 2. Dimensions of professionalism and current challenges. 3. The environment and changing it. 4. Organization: Influence Potential?. 5. Human resources management: A major potential for influence.

Página 26 de 38