Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

THE HAZARDS OF MAKING PUBLIC SCHOOLING A PRIVATE BUSINESS

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/1999, pág. 697

Sumario
1. The dual ideals underlyng public education. 2. Market complications. 3. Privatization?s Message and the gaps left by the market. 4. Preserving the ideal with options other than exit.

THE HOBGOBLIN OF LITTLE MINDS? OUR FOOLISH LAW OF INCONSISTENT VERDICTS.

MULLER, ERIC L.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/1998, pág. 771

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. What is an inconsistent verdict?. a) The nature of a true inconsistency. b) The reasons for inconsistent verdicts. 3. The current response to inconsistent verdicts. a) The argument from uncertainty. b) The argument from equity. c) The argument from remedy. d) The seductiveness of the court's arguments. 4. The inadequacy of the current response to inconsistent verdicts. 5. Better responses to inconsistent verdicts. 6. Conclusion.

THE IMPLICATIONS OF COALITIONAL AND INFLUENCE DISTRICTS FOR VOTE DILUTION LITIGATION.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2004, pág. 2598 a 2620

Sumario
I. EVALUATING VOTE DILUTION AFTER ASHCROFT. II. RECONCEPTUALIZING GINGLES IN COALITIONAL DISTRICTS. III.INFLUENCE DILUTION AS PARTISAN GERRIMANDERING. IV.CONCLUSION.

THE IRRATIONAL APPLICATION OF RATIONAL BASIS: KIMEL, GARRETT, AND CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO ABROGATE STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/2001, pág. 2146

Sumario
1. The application of rational basis review toantidiscrimination legislation. a) Kimel and Garrett. b)Generic classifications and individualized determinations.2. Justifications for different levels of scrutiny. a)Reasons to distinguish between generic classifications andindividualized determinations. b) Drawbacks of applyingheightened scrutiny to individualized determinations. 3.Congressional power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment. a)The meaning of the Equal Protection Clause. b) Congressionalpower under the Enforcement Clause. c) As-appliedconsideration of the ADEA adn the ADA. 4. Conclusion.

THE IRRELEVANCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS

STRAUSS, DAVID A.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/2001, pág. 1457

Sumario
1. Constitutional change and constitutionalamendments. 2. Non-amendment amendments. 3. The civil waramendments (and non-amendments). 4. Rules of the road. 5.The progressive era amendments. 6. Conclusion.

THE LAW OF CYBERSPACE

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/1999, pág. 1574

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Communities virtual and real:social and political dynmics of law in cyberspace. 3. Thelong arm of cyber-reach. 4. Internet regulation througharchitectural modification: the property rule structure ofcode solutions. 5. The domain name system: a case study ofthe significance of norms to internet governance. 6.Cyberspace regulation and the discourse of statesovereignty.

THE LAW OF THE HORSE: WHAT CYBERLAW MIGHT TEACH

LESSIG, LAWRENCE

Harvard Law Review, n.º 2/1999, pág. 501

Sumario
1. Regulatory spaces, real and "Cyber". a) Twoproblems in zoned speech. b) Modalities of regulation. c)How modalities interact. 2. Interactions: Law andarchitecture. a) Law taming Code: Increasing CyberspaceRegulability. b) Code displacing law. c) Law regulatingcode. 3. Lessons. a) The limits on regulability. b)Questions about law's regulation of code. c) Questions aboutcode's regulation of law. 4. Conclusion.

THE LAWS OF FEAR

SUNSTEIN, CASS R.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 4/2002, pág. 1119

Sumario
I. Mental shortcuts and intuitive toxicology. II. Emotions and the affect heuristic. III. The psychometric paradigm: are experts irrational?. IV. Demography, trust, and paternalism. V. Risk regulation, psychologically informed.

THE LIMITS OF CHOICE: SCHOOL CHOICE REFORM AND STATE CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES OF EDUCATIONAL QUALITY

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/1996, pág. 2002

Sumario
1. School choice reforms and the risk of inadequate education. 2. A possible safety net: State constitutional guarantees of educational quality. 3. Guaranteeing adequate education under school choice policies. 4. Conclusion.

THE NEW LEGAL PROCESS, THE SYNTHESIS OF DISCOURSE, AND THE MICROANALYSIS OF INSTITUTIONS

RUBIN, EDWARD L.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/1996, pág. 1393

Sumario
1. The rise and fall of the legal process movement. 2. The partial return of legal process. 3. The foundations of a new synthesis of discourse. 4. The methodology and substance of a new synthesis of discourse. 5. The value of a new synthesis. 6. Conclusion.

Página 21 de 25