Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

BARTH, THOMAS J.;ARNOLD, EDDY

ARPA. The American Review of Public Aministration, n.º 4/1999, pág. 332

Sumario
1. The lens of AI. 2. Responsiveness. 3. Judgment.4. Accountability. 5. Summarizing: Potential benefits anddangers of AI for public administration. 6. Benefits of AI.7. Dangers of AI. 8. Conclusion.

ASSESSING ADMINISTRATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY. RESULTS FROM A NATIONAL SURVEY

WANG, XIAOHU

ARPA. The American Review of Public Aministration, n.º 3/2002, pág. 350 a 370

Sumario
I. FRAMEWORK. II. METHODOLOGY. III. FINDINGS. IV. CONCLUSION.

ASSESSING LOCAL GOVERNMENT SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICIES

REESE, LAURA A.; LINDENBERG, KAREN E.

ARPA. The American Review of Public Aministration, n.º 3/2002, pág. 295 a 311

Sumario
I. MODEL SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY. II. METHODOLOGY. III. SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICIES. IV. POLICY CRITIQUE AND RECOMMENDATIONS. V. CONCLUSION. VI. APPENDIX.

ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF SOLID WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAMS OVER TIME

FEIOCK, RICHARD C.;GRAHAM KALAN, LESLEY

ARPA. The American Review of Public Aministration, n.º 1/2001, pág. 22

Sumario
1. Explaining recycling success. 2. Analysis. 3.Conclusions.

ASSESSING THE VALIDITY, LEGITIMACY, AND FUNCIONALITY OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS IN MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS

STREIB, GREGORY D.;POISTER, THEODORE H.

ARPA. The American Review of Public Aministration, n.º 2/1999, pág. 107

Sumario
1. Assessing performance measurement efforts. 2.Methodology. 3. Findings. 4. Discussion.

ATTEMPTING NON-INCREMENTAL BUDGET CHANGE IN OREGON: AN EXERCISE IN POLICY SHARING

SIMONSEN, WILLIAM;JOHNSTON, NANCY;BARNETT, RUSSELL

ARPA. The American Review of Public Aministration, n.º 2/1996, pág. 231

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Models of Governmental Decision Making. a) Rational and Incremental Decision Making. b) Bringing Democracy into the Process. 3. Lessons from the Literature. a) Use a Rigorous Research Design. b) Provide Adequate Resources. c) Be inclusive. d) Make the Process ...

AVALANCHES AND INCREMENTALISM. MAKING POLICY AND BUDGETS IN THE UNITED STATES

TRUE, JAMES L.

ARPA. The American Review of Public Aministration, n.º 1/2000, pág. 3

Sumario
1. Budgeting and the failure of pureincrementalism. 2. Understanding policy making today. 3. Thepunctual equilibrium theory of policy making. 4. Theavalanche budget model. 5. Data, analysis, and findings. 6.Conclusion.

AVOIDING THE ISSUE. RACISM AND ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

ALEXANDER, JENNIFER

ARPA. The American Review of Public Aministration, n.º 4/1997, pág. 343

Sumario
1. The social construction of race and racism. 2. The role of race within public administration. 3. Administrative responsibility and its source in customary morality. a) The responsible administrator as neutral technician. b) The responsible administrator as delegate. c) The responsible administrator as enlightened trustee. 4. Administrative responsibility reconceived. 5. Conclusion.

BARRIERS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT-CAPACITY IN NIGERIA

MEAD, TIMOTHY D.

ARPA. The American Review of Public Aministration, n.º 2/1996, pág. 159

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Barriers to Local-Government Area Capacity in Nigeria. a) Instability in Local Government. b) Financial Barriers to Local Capacity. c) Traditional Rulers and local Discretion. d) Absence of a Tradition of Accommodation Between Elected and Professional Officials. e) Short-Term Perspectives. 3. Prospects for Local-Government Capacity in Nigeria.

BETTER, FASTER, STRONGER: GOVERNMENT REINVENTION IN THE 1990S

DURST, SAMANTHA L.;NEWELL, CHARLDEAN

ARPA. The American Review of Public Aministration, n.º 1/1999, pág. 61

Sumario
1. Outline of research design. 2. Characteristics of respondents. 3. What kinds of organizations have pursued reinvention?. 4. What actions have been taken under the mantle of reinvention?. 5. Who/what prompted the reinvention activities?. a) Have the reinvention efforts been successful?. 6. Summary and conclusions. 7. Notes. 8. References.

Página 2 de 17