Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

ADMISSIONS RITUALS AS POLITICAL ACTS: GUARDIANS AT THE GATES OF OUR DEMOCRATIC IDEALS.

GUINIER, LANI

Harvard Law Review, n.º 1/2003, pág. 114 a 224

Sumario
1. THE DEMOCRATIC AND EDUCATIONAL MISSSIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION: ADMISSIONS JUDGMENTS AS POLITICAL ACTS 2. CONTEST, SPONSORED, AND STRUCTURAL MOBILITY: ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF CONCEPTUALIZING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATION AND DEMOCRACY 3. ENTER THE SUPREME COURT 4. PURSUING THE PROMISE AND HEEDING THE WARNING 5. LOOKING FORWARD TO THE FUTURE 6. CONCLUSION

AFTER SANDOVAL: JUDICIAL CHALLENGES AND ADMINISTRATIVE POSSIBILITIES IN TITLE VI ENFORCEMENT

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/2003, pág. 1774

Sumario
INTRODUCTION. I. BEFORE AND AFTER SANDOVAL: PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TITLE VI ENFORCEMENT. II. THE VALIDITY OF DISPARATE IMPACT REGULATIONS. III. FILLING THE TITLE VI ENFORCEMENT GAP. CONCLUSION.

AGENCY RULES WITH FORCE OF LAW: THE ORIGINAL CONVENTION.

MERRILL, THOMAS W.;TONGUE WATTS, KATHRYN

Harvard Law Review, n.º 2/2002, pág. 469 a 592

Sumario
1. INTRODUCCTION 2. WHY TUE MEANING OF RULEMAKING GRANTS MATTERS 3. TEXTUALIST INTERPRETATION OF FACIALLY AMBIGUOUS RULEMAKING GRANTS 4. THE CONVENTION CREATED 5. THE CONVENTION IGNORED 6. THE CONVENTION ERASED 7. TAX EXCEPTIONALISM 8. WHAT THE CONVECTION MEANS TODAY 9. CONCLUSION

AN EVIDENTIARY FRAMEWORK FOR DIVERSITY AS A COMPELLING INTEREST IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/1996, pág. 1357

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. The current Constitutional framework for affirmative action policies. 3. The proper evidentiary framework for reviewing the compelling nature of diversity in higher education. 4. The contribution of racial diversity to higher education. 5. Conclusion.

ANTIDISCRIMINATION AND ACCOMMODATION

JOLLS, CHRISTINE

Harvard Law Review, n.º 2/2001, pág. 642

Sumario
Introduction. I. Definitions. II. Antidiscrimination as accommodation - Cases of equivalence. III. Additional parallels between antidiscrimination and accommodation. IV. Affirmative action. Conclusion.

ANTITRUST AND THE INFORMATION AGE: SECTION 2 MONOPOLIZATION ANALYSES IN THE NEW ECONOMY

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/2001, pág. 1623

Sumario
1. Traditional section 2 analysis. 2. Marketrealities of the New Economy. 3. Section 2 Analysis and theNew Economy. 4. Conclusion.

ANTITRUST LAW. VERTICAL MAXIMUN PRICE FIXING. SEVENTH CIRCUIT APPLIES PER SE PROHIBITION BUT DISPUTES ITS SOUNDNESS

Harvard Law Review, n.º 2/1996, pág. 523

ARE TAX BENEFITS CONSTITUTIONALLY EQUIVALEN TO DIRECT EXPENDITURES?

ZELINSKY, EDWARD A.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 2/1998, pág. 379

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. The contemporary controversies: Virginia, Camps Newfound/Owatonna, West Lynn Creamery, and Rosenberger. 3. The early cases and their critics: Walz, Texas Monthly, Nyquist, and Mueller. 4. The equivalence Issue: A Case-by-case Approach. 5. Revisiting the contemporary controversies. 6. Equivalency, indecency, and vouchers. 7. Conclusion.

ARTICLE 7(I) OF THE EUROPEAN CONTRACTS CONVENTION: CODIFYING THE PRACTICE OF APPLYING FOREIGN MANDATORY RULES

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2001, pág. 2462

Sumario
1. The convention methodology and the considerationof mandatory rules. 2. Objections raised to Article 7(I). 3.The doctrinal background: Dépeçage in the choice of law togovern contracts. a) Dépeçáge in the methodology fordetermining the Lex Causae. b) Dépeçage in the considerationof mandatory rules. 4. The advantages of Article 7(I). a)Certainty. b) Discretion. 5. Conclusion.

AS-APPLIED AND FACIAL CHALLENGES AND THIRD-PARTY STANDING

FALLON, RICHARD H.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/2000, pág. 1321

Sumario
1. As-applied challenges. 2. Facial challenges. 3.Third party-standing. 4. Are all rights rights againstrules?. 5. Conclusion.

Página 2 de 25