Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF MUNICIPAL POLICE SERVICES USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

NYHAN, RONALD C.;MARTIN, LAWRENCE L.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 1/1999, pág. 18

Sumario
1. Comparative performance assessment. 2. Dataenvelopment analysis. 3. Study design. 4. Data Analysis. 5. Summary and conclusion.

AT WHAT PRICE?. COSTS OF FEDERAL MANDATES SINCE THE 1980S

RIDLEN RAY, MARCELLA;CONLAN, TIMOTHY J.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 1/1996, pág. 7

ATTITUDES TOWARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT: A COMPARISON OF TWO WEST TEXAS CITIES

SOMMA, MARK;NIKOLAI, SCOTT;SKOPEK, TRACY

State and Local Government Review, n.º 2/1999, pág. 135

Sumario
1. Environmental opinion. 2. Studying theeconomic-environmental balance. 3. Theorizing publicconfidence. 4. Data and measurement. 5. Conclusion.

BANS ON EXECUTING THE MENTALLY RETARDED: AN EVENT HISTORY ANALYSIS OF STATE POLICY ADOPTION.

CRAIG F.EMMERT Y CAROL ANN TRAUT.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 2/2003, pág. 112 a 122

Sumario
I.ANALYSIS OF STATE POLICY ADOPTION. II.DATA AND METHODS. III.FINDINGS. IV.CONCLUSION.

BUILDING STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT ANALYTIC CAPACITY: USING REGIONAL ECONOMIC MODELS FOR ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC POLICY

DUNCOMBRE, WILLIAM;WONG, WILSON

State and Local Government Review, n.º 3/1998, pág. 165

Sumario
1. Comparing tools for assessing regional economicimpacts. a) Simple traditional methods. b) Moresophisticated methods. 2. Use of sophisticated regionalmodels in practice. a) Survey of the literature. b)Influence of results. 3. An integrated framework forevaluation. a) Technical factors. b) Organizational factors.c) Political factors. 4. Conclusion.

CAMPAIGN SPENDING IN STATE LEGISLATIVE PRIMARY ELECTIONS

HOGAN, ROBERT E.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 3/1999, pág. 214

Sumario
1. Data. 2. Variations in primary spending. 3.Explaining variations in spending. 4. Conclusion.

CHANGING STATE-LOCAL FISCAL RELATIONS AND SCHOOL FINANCE IN KANSAS: PURSUING EQUITY

JOHNSTON, JOCELYN M.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 1/1998, pág. 26

Sumario
1. Equity and aid formulas: Theoreticalconsiderations. 2. The Kansas reform. a) The pre-reformsystem. b) Major features of the reform. c) State-localtensions. d) Interdistrict education cost variations. 3.Implications for state-local relations. 4. In conclusion.

CHARLOTTE: A MODEL FOR MARKET-DRIVEN PUBLIC-SECTOR MANAGEMENT

JURKIEWICZ, CAROLE L.; BOWMAN, JAMES S.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 3/2002, pág. 205 a 213

Sumario
I. The Charlotte Experience. 1. Create Clarity of Purpose. 2. Create Consequences for Performance. 3. Put the Customer in the Driver's Seat. 4. Shift Control Away from the Top and Center. 5. Create an Entrepreneurial Culture. II. Lessons. III. Cautions. IV. Conclusion.

CHARTER SCHOOLS AS A STATE POLICY INNOVATION: ASSESSING RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

MINTROM, MICHAEL;VERGARI, SANDRA

State and Local Government Review, n.º 1/1997, pág. 43

Sumario
1. The Charter Schools Concept. 2. Variations in Charter Scool Laws. 3. Discussion and Conclusion.

CITIES IN STATE POLITICS: VIEWS OF MAYORS AND MANAGERS

DE SOTO, WILLIAM

State and Local Government Review, n.º 3/1995, pág. 188

Sumario
1. Previous research. 2. Research questions and data. 3. What are municipal interests?. 4. Are municipal interests cohesive?. 5. How are municipal interests represented in state politics?. 6. How receptive are states to municipal interests?. 7. Conclusion.

Página 2 de 13