Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

RECENT CASES: CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - FIFTH AMENDMENT - THIRD CIRCUIT DENIES SELF-INCRIMINATION PRIVILEGE AT SENTENCING HEARING. - UNITED STATES V. MITCHELL, 122 F.3D 185 (3D CIR. 1997).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 4/1998, pág. 1140

RECENT CASES: CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -VENUE- THIRD CIRCUIT FINDS VENUE FOR FIREARMS CHARGE IMPROPER IN DISTRICT WHERE ONLY PREDICATE OFFENSE OCCURRED. UNITED STATES V. PALMA-RUEDAS, 121 F.3D 841 (3D CIR. 1997), CERT. DENIED, 66 U.S.L.W. 3456 (U.S. JAN. 12, 1998) (NO. 97-6888).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 4/1998, pág. 1134

RECENT CASES: FIRST AMENDMENT -PUBLIC FORUM- SECOND CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT MIDDLE SCHOOL AUDITORION IS NOT A PUBLIC FORUM AND THAT EXCLUSION OF RELIGIOUS ACTIVITIES IS PERMISSIBLE. BRONX HOUSEHOLD OF FAITH V. COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. IO, 127 F.3D 207 (2D CIR. 1997), PETITION FOR CERT. FILED, 66 U.S.L.W. 3577 (U.S. MAR. 3, 1998) (NO. 97-1361).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/1998, pág. 1608

RECENT CASES: FIRST AMENDMENT. PATRONAGE TERMINATIONS - FOURTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT DEPUTY SHERIFFS MAY BE FIRED BECAUSE OF POLITICAL AFFILIATION. - JENKINS V. MEDFORD, 119 F.3D 1156 (4TH CIR. 1997) (EN BANC), CERT. DENIED, 118 S. CT. 881 (1998).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/1998, pág. 1596

RECENT CASES: SEPARATION OF POWERS - HEAD-OF-STATE IMMUNITY - ELEVENTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH'S CAPTURE OF NORIEGA EXEMPTS HIM FROM HEAD-OF-STATE IMMUNITY. UNITED STATES V. NORIEGA, 117 F.3D 1206 (IITH CIR. 1997).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/1998, pág. 849

RECENT CASES: STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - SCHOOL FUNDING - OHIO SUPREME COURT DECLARES STATE'S PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCING SYSTEM UNCONSTITUTIONAL. DEROLPH V. STATE, 677 N.E.2D 733 (OHIO 1997).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/1998, pág. 855

RECENT CASES: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION - AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT - FOURTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT ASYMPTOMATIC HIV CANNOT CONSTITUTE A DISABILITY. RUNNEBAUM V. NATIONSBANK OF MARYLAND, N.A., 123 F.3D 156 (4TH CIR. 1997) (EN BANC).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 3/1998, pág. 843

RECENT CASES: TITLE VII - SEXUAL HARASSMENT - SEVENTH CIRCUIT ADOPTS EMPLOYER LIABILITY STANDARDS FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT BY SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES. - JANSEN V. PACKAGING CORP. OF AMERICA, 123 F.3D 490 (7TH CIR. 1997) (EN BANC), CERT. GRANTED, 118 S. CT. 876 (1998).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/1998, pág. 1602

RECLAIMING HOME RULE.

BARRON, DAVID J.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2003, pág. 2255 a 2386

Sumario
1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE STANDARD VIEW: HOME RULE VERSUS ANTI-SPRAWL REFORM 3. THE HOME RULE MOVEMENT A) LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAW BEFORE THE HOME RULE MOVEMENT B) CONFLICTING VISIONS WITHING THE HOME RULE MOVEMENT C) COMMONALITIES AMONG THE COMPETING VISIONS OF HOME RULE 4. THE RISE OF THE SUBURBS AND THE REFORMIST TURN AGAINST HOME RULE 5. HOW TO RECLAIM HOME RULR TO COMBAT APRAWL 6. CONCLUSION

RECONCEPTUALIZING THE ROLE OF CONSTRUCTIVE WAIVER AFTER SEMINOLE

Harvard Law Review, n.º 7/1999, pág. 1759

Sumario
1. The eleventh amendment and state sovereignimmunity. 2. Sovereign immunity as a shield for illegalstate action. 3. Constructive waiver: fostering stateaccountability under federal law after seminole. 4.Conclusion.

Página 16 de 25