Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY AND FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATIONS: A PROBLEM BEST AVOIDED.

SAPERDTEIN, DAVID

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/2003, pág. 1353 a 1396

Sumario
1. INTRODUCTION 2. TYPES OF RELIGIOUS SERVICE PROVIDERS 3. THE PROBLEM OF MIXED MOTIVES 4. POLICY REASONS TO ESCHEW DIRECT GOVERMENT FUNDING OF PERVASIVELY SECTARIAN INSTITUTIONS A) THREATS TO RELIGIOUS AUTONOMY B) DILUTION OF RELIGIOUS MISSION C) THE TEMPTATION TO MUTE THE PROPHETIC 0BLIGATION D) COMPROMISING THE BENEFITS OF COMPETITION F) INCREASED SOCIAL DIVISIVENESS G) LACK OF EVIDENCE OF EFFICACY 5. CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS A) THE SUPREME COURT HAS YET TO UPHOLD DIRECT FUNDING B) DIRECT FUNDING WILL IMPIGNE ON THE RIGHTS OF SOCIAL SERVICE BENEFICIARIES C) DIRECT FUNDING OFFERS NO TRUE INDIVIDUAL CHOICE D) INTERMEDIARY ORGANIZATIONS RAISE SIGNIFICANT LEGAL CONCERNS E) FUNGIBILITY LEADS TO GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR RELIGIOUS ACTIVITY 6. THE PARADOX OF NEUTRALITY 7. SHOULD FEDERALITY FUNDED RELIGIOUS ENTITIES BE EXEMPT FROM EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAWS? 8. CONCLUSION

PUNISHING DANGEROUSNESS: CLOAKING PREVENTIVE DETENTION AS CRIMINAL JUSTICE

ROBINSON, PAUL H.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/2001, pág. 1429

Sumario
1. How strong is the need for increasedprevention?. 2. The justice problems. 3. The inevitableconflict between desert and dangerousness as distributivecriteria. 4. Denying the conflict. 5. The utility of desert.6. Cloaking preventive detention as criminal justice. 7. Thepractical value of creating desert-dangerousness ambiguity.8. Surreptitiously discounting the significance of resultingharm. 9. The preventive detention problems. 10. Segregatingjustice and protection.

RACE, RIGHTS, AND REMEDIES: CENSUS SAMPLING AND THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT

Harvard Law Review, n.º 8/2001, pág. 2502

Sumario
1. The relevance of sampling. a) The census, theundercount, and the proposed remedy. b) The political andeconomic salience of the undercount. 2. Sampling litigationin the 1990s. a) The 1990 census and the Wisconsin decision.b) The 2000 census and the Department of Commerce decision.3. Subconstitutional resistance to sampling, and theresistance to the resistance. a) The traditional section 2challenge. b) The claim of Reynolds dilution. 4. Conclusion.

RACES, CRIMES, AND THE LAW.

DINH, VIET D.

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/1998, pág. 1289

Sumario
1. The biracial simplification. 2. Multiracial neutrality. 3. Neutrality in criminal law.

REASONALBLE UMBRAGE: RACE AND CONSTITUTIONAL ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW IN THE UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AFRICA

I. MICHELMAN, FRANK

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/2004, pág. 1378 a 1419

Sumario
SUMMARY: ¨1.¨VIRTUALLY SACRED TO OUR NATION AS A WHOLE¨-CLASSIFICATION, MALTREATMENTE, AND FUSION 2. BROWN AND THE IMPULSE TO FUSION IN THE UNITED STATES 3. ANTICLASSIFICATION AS A SIDE CONSTRAINT 4.MEANS AND ENDS IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF ANTIDISCRIMINATION 5. THE ANTICLASSIFICATION SIDE CONSTRAINT: EVIDENCE AND EFFECT 6. THE VIEW FROM BRAAMFONTEIN: TOWARD THE RULE OF REASONABLE UMBRAGE 7. THE TEXT 8. TABLE-SETTING: THE HUGO CASE 9. THE FACTS OF WALKER 10. SYNOPSIS OF THE ARGUMENTS 11. THE CENTRALITY OF DIGNITARY HARM 12. REASONABLE UMBRAGE 13. CONCLUSION

RECENT CASES: 42 U.S.C. & 1983 - QUALIFIED IMMUNITY - ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FINDS STUDENTS' FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS NOT CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. JENKINS V. TALLADEGA CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, 115 F.3D 821 (IITH CIR.) (EN BANC), CERT. DENIED, 118 S. CT. 412 (1997).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/1998, pág. 1341

RECENT CASES: AMERICAN INDIAN LAW- TRIBAL COURT CIVIL JURISDICTION- NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT BLACKFEET TRIBAL COURT LACKS SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER TORT SUIR ARISING ON RESERVATION BETWEEN MEMBER AND NONMEMBER. WILSON V. MARCHINGTON, 127 F.3D 805 (9TH CIR. 1997).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 6/1998, pág. 1620

RECENT CASES: CIVIL PROCEDURE - PERSONAL JURISDICTION - ELEVENTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT MINIMUM CONTACTS WITH THE UNITED STATES DO NOT AUTOMATICALLY CONFER JURISDICTION OVER A DEFENDANT SERVED VIA A NATIONWIDE SERVICE OF PROCESS STATUTE. PANAMA V. BCCI HOLDINGS, 119 F.3D 935 (IITH CIR. 1997).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/1998, pág. 1359

RECENT CASES: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND EX POST FACTO CLAUSES - THIRD CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT OF MEGAN'S LAW DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PUNISHMENT. E.B. V. VERNIERO, 119 F.3D 1077 (3D CIR. 1997).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/1998, pág. 1353

RECENT CASES: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - FIRST AMENDMENT AND EQUAL PROTECTION - NINTH CIRCUIT UPHOLDS DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL POLICY FOR GAYS AND LESBIANS IN THE MILITARY. HOLMES V. CALIFORNIA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, 124 F.3D 1126 (9TH CIR. 1997).

Harvard Law Review, n.º 5/1998, pág. 1371

Página 14 de 25