Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

RECRUITMENT TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS IN SMALL CITIES: INDIVIDUAL VERSUS CONTEXTUAL EXPLANATIONS

BAKER, JOHN R.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 3/2006, pág. 142 a 155

Sumario
1. SELECTIVE INCENTIVES, CIVIC VOLUNTARISM, AND THE CONTEXT FO RECRUITMENT. 2. DATA. 3. RECRUITMENT PATTERNS. 4. THEORIZING BOARD RECRUITMENT PATTERNS: INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS. 5. DISCUSSION. 6. INDIVIDUAL V. CONTEXTUAL FACTORS AND THE PROBABILITY OF SELF-RECRUITING. 7. CONCLUSION.

REGIONALISM, LOCALISM, AND METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE: SUGGESTIONS FROM THE RESEARCH PROGRAM ON LOCAL PUBLIC ECONOMIES

PARKS, ROGER B.;OAKERSON, RONALD J.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 3/2000, pág. 169

Sumario
1. The Research Program in Local Public Economies.2. Key Findings an Conclusions from the Research Program. 3.The Continuing Challenge of Metropolitan Governance.

REGULATORY REFORM AND URBAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

FEIOCK, RICHARD C.; JEONG, MOON-GI

State and Local Government Review, n.º 3/2002, pág. 153 a 159

Sumario
I. How Does Regulation Affect Development? II. Regulating without Economic Loss. III. Research Design. IV. Findings. V. Conclusions.

REINVENTING IMAGES: STATE LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS TO REACH THE PUBLIC

OPHEIM, CYNTHIA

State and Local Government Review, n.º 2/1996, pág. 136

Sumario
1. Reconnecting the public. 2. Describing public relations efforts. 3. Explaining the differences in innovation. 4. Analysis. 5. Discussion.

RESPONSES TO FEDERAL DEVOLUTION: MEASURING STATE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFORTS

HUNTER BACOT, A.;DAWES, ROY A.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 2/1996, pág. 124

Sumario
1. Theoretical framework and methodology. 2. Dependent variable: Environmental Effort. 3. Analysis and discussion. 4. Conclusions and implications.

REVOLVING FUNDS AS BUDGETINS TOOLS: AN EXAMINATION OF OKLAHOMA STATE AGENCIES.

AIMEE L.FRANKLIN Y JAMES W.DOUGLAS

State and Local Government Review, n.º 2/2004, pág. 90 a 101

Sumario
I.DESCRIPTION OF REVOLVING FUNDS. II.LITERATURE REVIEW. III.RESEARCH DESIGN AND DATA ANALYSIS. IV.FINDINGS. V.INCREASING MANAGERIAL FLEXIBILITY. V.REDUCING WASTEFUL END-OF-YEAR EXPENDITURES. VI.ACCOUNTABILITY. VII.CONCLUSION.

SPECIAL-DISTRICT FORMATION AMONG THE STATES

MCCABE, BARBARA COYLE

State and Local Government Review, n.º 2/2000, pág. 121

Sumario
1. Factors that influence the likelihood ofspecial-district formation. a) State institutions b).Public entrepreneurs. c) Demand of services. 2. Approach.3. Analysis. 4. Conclusion.

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS OF CIVIL SERVICE REFORM IN FLORIDA: A DESCRIPTIVE, INSTRUMENTAL, NORMATIVE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE

WEST, JONATHAN P.; BOWMAN, JAMES S.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 1/2004, pág. 20

Sumario
1. THE STAKEHOLDER FRAMEWORK. 2. DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS. 3. INSTRUMENTAL AND NORMATIVE ANALYSIS. A) EMPLOYMENT STATUS. B) HUMAN RESOURCE FUNCTION. 4. FINDINGS. 5. CONCLUSION.

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS OF CIVIL SERVICE REFORM IN FLORIDA: A DESCRIPTIVE, INSTRUMENTAL, NORMATIVE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE

WEST, JONATHAN P. Y BOWMAN, JAMES S.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 1/2004, pág. 20 a 34

Sumario
1. THE STAKEHOLDER FRAMEWORK. 2. DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS. 3. INSTRUMENTAL AND NORMATIVE ANALYSIS. 4. FINDINGS. 5. CONCLUSION.

STATE INNOVATION IN NATURAL RESOURCES POLICY: ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT ON PUBLIC FORESTS

KOONTZ, TOMAS M.

State and Local Government Review, n.º 3/2002, pág. 160 a 172

Sumario
I. Understanding Where Ecosystem Management Has Been Adopted. 1. Previous Research. 2. Analysis. II. Methods. 1. Level of Ecosystem Management Adoption. 2. Factors Associated with Adoption of Ecosystem Management. III. Results and Discussion. 1. Level of Ecosystem Management Adoption. 2. Factors Associated with Adoption of Ecosystem Management. IV. Conclusion.

Página 10 de 13