Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

MANAGING THE HIV/AIDS PANDEMIC: PAVING A PATH INTO THE FUTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND ORGANIZATION

MAMELI, PETER A.

Law And Policy, n.º 2/2000, pág. 203

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. International actors, publicinternational law, and United Nations reform. 3. TheHIV/AIDS pandemic. 4. From quasi-legislation to convention?.5. Conclusion.

MEDICAL ERROR AND PATIENT SAFETY: UNDERSTANDING CULTURES IN CONFLICT

WEINBERG, JOANNA K.

Law And Policy, n.º 2/2002, pág. 93

Sumario
I. Introduction. II. International perspectives on patient safety. III. The culture of decision making. IV. The culture of quality measurement: walking on quicksand. V. The need for systematic (and systemic) regulation. VI. Conclusion.

META RISK MANAGEMENT AND RESPOSIBE REGULARION FOR TAX SYSTEM INTEGRITY.

JOHN BRAITHWAITE

Law And Policy, n.º 1/2003, pág. 1 a 16

Sumario
I. THE RISK PARADIGM IN COMPLIANCE ADMINISTRATION. II.THE DEVELOPING PRACTICE OF META RISK MANAGEMENT. III. THE REGISTERED SOFTWARE PROJECT. IV. THE TRANSFER PRICING RECORD REVIEW AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. V.CONCLUSION.

MINNESOTA SENTENCING GUIDELINES: A STRUCTURE FOR CHANGE

DAILEY, DEBRA L.

Law And Policy, n.º 3/1998, pág. 311

Sumario
1. Overview of sentencing reform. 2. Changes in compliance with the guidelines. 3. Maintaining rational sentencing policy. 4. Conclusion.

MODELING DISCRETION IN AMERICAN SENTENCING SYSTEMS

REITZ, KEVIN R.

Law And Policy, n.º 4/1998, pág. 389

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Discretion theory for sentencing systems. a) Definitions. b) Diagrams. c) Five hypotheses. 3. Modeling sentencing discretion in three guideline jurisdictions. a) The federal system. b) Pennsylvania. c) Minnesota. 4. Conclusion. 5. Notes. 6. References.

MOVING BEYOND COMMAND-AND-CONTROL: REFLEXIVITY IN THE REGULATION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT

AALDERS, MARIUS;WILTHAGEN, TON

Law And Policy, n.º 4/1997, pág. 415

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Regulation and self-regulation in two arenas. a) The work environment. b) The external environment. 3. Reflexivity as a new paradigm. a) The concept of reflexivity. 4. Reflexive strategies. a) Systems monitoring. b) Intermediary structures and networks. c) Corporate social responsibility. d) Market-oriented strategies. 5. Conclusion.

NATIONAL STYLES OF WORKER PROTECTION IN THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN: THE CASE OF THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY

WOKUTCH, RICHARD E.;VANSANDT, CRAIG V.

Law And Policy, n.º 3/2000, pág. 369

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Background to this research. 3.Injury and illness statistics. 4. The japanese safety andhealth system. 5. What the U.S. and Japan can learn fromeach other. 6. Conclusion.

NEGOTIATION, POWER IN CONCILIATION, AND REVIEW OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS

GUTHRIE, ROBERT

Law And Policy, n.º 3/2002, pág. 229

Sumario
I. Introduction. II. Conciliation officers. III. Review officers. IV. Compensation magistrates. V. The Supreme Court. VI. "Repeat players" and "one-shotters" in workers compensation disputes. VII. Power in compensation claims. VIII. The exercize of power by workers. IX. Personal power, literacy and cultural diversity. X. Stress claims. XI. Gender. XII. The exercise of power by employers and insurers. XIII. The exercise of power by conciliation and review officers. XIV. Lawyers and the exercise of power. XV. The effect of power imbalances in compensation disputes. XVI. Observations. XVII. Conclusions.

NEW INSTITUTIONALISM AND NATURALISM IN SOCIO-LEGAL ANALYSIS: INSTITUTIONALIST APPROACHES TO REGULATORY DECISION MAKING

BLACK, JULIA

Law And Policy, n.º 1/1997, pág. 51

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. The new institutionalims: anoutline. 3. New institutionalisms and decision making. 4.Institutionalism and naturalism. 5. Institutionalism, legaldecision making and regulatory processes. 6.Institutionalisms, socio-legal analysis and the legalparadigm.

OPENING PANDORA'S BOX: PROTECTING CHILDREN AGAINST TORTURE OR CRUEL, INHUMAN AND DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT

VAN BUEREN, GERALDINE

Law And Policy, n.º 4/1995, pág. 377

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Four dilemmas. 3. Torture: The public and the private spheres. 4. International and regional jurisprudence. 5. Conclusion.

Página 5 de 11