Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

INTRODUCTION TO MODELS OF SENTENCING REFORM IN THE UNITED STATES AND EFFECTS ON THE SANCTIONING PROCESS

SHANE-DUBOW, SANDRA

Law And Policy, n.º 3/1998, pág. 231

Sumario
1. Structured sentencing. 2. Unitended consequences and complexity. 3. Shifting rationale for reform. 4. Five structured sentencing systems. 5. The next decade.

INTRODUCTION: COMPARING NATIONAL STYLES OF REGULATION IN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES

KAGAN, ROBERT A.

Law And Policy, n.º 3/2000, pág. 225

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Comparing regulatory systems:policy versus process. 3. Probing the conventional images ofnational styles of regulation. 4. Some consequences ofcontrasting styles of regulation. 5. Conclusion.

INTRODUCTION: PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, LAW AND POLICY

MACHURA, STEFAN

Law And Policy, n.º 1/1998, pág. 1

Sumario
1. The four studies presented. 2. About procedures. 3. About fair procedures. 4. Theories of justice. 5. Some political implications.

INTRODUCTION: THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL AND THE FUTURE OF GLOBAL LEGISLATION

ALFRED C. AMAN, JR.

Law And Policy, n.º 1/1993, pág. 1

Sumario
1. The Montreal Protocol: Two negotiating phasesìand three perspectives. a) Science. b) Economics. c) Equity.ìd) The global regulatory dialogue. 2. Montreal and Rio. 3.ìConclusion.

LAW, POLITICS, AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN: A CASE STUDY OF PALESTINIANS IN ISRAEL

SHALHOUB-KEVORKIAN, NADERA

Law And Policy, n.º 2/1999, pág. 189

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Literature review. 3.Palestinian-arab society in Israel. 4. The study. 5.Findings a) Social and cultural variables. b) Politicizationof the law. 6. Conclusion.

LEGAL AMBIGUITY AND THE POLITICS OF COMPLIANCE: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OFFICERS' DILEMMA

EDELMAN, LAURENT B;PETTERSON, STEPHEN;CHAMBLISS, ELIZABETH;ERLANGER, HOWARD S.

Law And Policy, n.º 1/1991, pág. 73

Sumario
1. Introduction: organizational compliance asìprocess. 2. EEO/AA Law and its implementation by affirmativeìaction officers. 3. Data and methods. 4. Officers' responsesìto structural contradictions. 5.Discussion and implications.

LEGAL REGULATION AND COMMUNICATIVE COUPLINGS

BORN, ASMUND W.;GOLDSCHMIDT, LARS B.

Law And Policy, n.º 1/1997, pág. 23

Sumario
1.Introduction. 2. Systems theory. 3. Researchmethods. 4. Risk case: categories and regulation. 5. Riskcase: developing a discourse. 6. Risk case: discursiveclosure and risk. 7. Law, coupling, and democracy. 8.Afterthought.

LET SPECIFICITY, CLARITY, AND PARSIMONY OF PURPOSE BE OUR GUIDE

SMITH, MICHAEL E.

Law And Policy, n.º 4/1998, pág. 491

Sumario
1. Introduction: what does the rule of law require?. a) What has been lost in the construction of presumptive grid guidelines?. b) What is gained by a rule of law requiring the court to reason from purpose to sentence, by inferences form the facts and circumstances of each case?. 2. The importance of specificity, clarity, and parsimony of penal purpose and strategy in noncustodial sentencing. a) Why is specificity of penal purpose and strategy important?. b) Why is clarity important?. c) Why is parsimony important?. 3. How clarity and specificity of penal purpose and strategy make individual characteristics and circumstances relevant. a) Homelessness. b) Poverty. c) Family responsibilities and circumstances. d) Employment. 4. Some specifics on managing the risk of failure. 5. Conclusion. 6. Notes. 7. References.

LIKE SHIPS THAT PASS IN THE NIGHT: AFDC POLICY AND BATTERED WOMEN

LENNETT, JUDITH

Law And Policy, n.º 2/1997, pág. 183

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Policies in conflict. 3. Toward an informed AFDC policy. 4. Conclusion.

MAKING SENSE OUT OF REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT.

MAY, PETER J.;BURBY, RAYMOND J.

Law And Policy, n.º 2/1998, pág. 157

Sumario
1. Making sense out of regulatory enforcement. 2. Reconsidering basic concepts. a) Sorting out levels: Agencies and inspectors. b) Confusing concepts and dimensions. c) Our approach to conceptualization. 3. Data and methods. 4. Enforcement philosophy. 5. Analyzing variation in enforcement philosophy. 6. Enforcement strategies. 7. Conclusions. 8. Notes.

Página 4 de 11