Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

THEORIES OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION: AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION

BRANS, MARLEEN

Public Administration, n.º 3/1992, pág. 429

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Reorganization in Belgium. 3.ìTheories of reorganization and belgian experience. 4.ìConclusions.

THERMOMETER OR SAUNA? PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND DEMOCRATIC ASSISTANCE IN THE UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (USAID)

HIRSCHMANN, DAVID

Public Administration, n.º 2/2002, pág. 235

Sumario
This article presents a case study of performance measurement in the United States Agency for International Developments (USAIDs) democracy and governance program. Its purpose is to illustrate the juxtaposition (and sometimes contradiction) between the high standards of casual logic and accuracy required or performance measurement, and the untidiness involved in the "politics or democratization". Based on USAID experiences in numerous countries, this article concentrates on four specific themes drawn mainly from the literature on re-engineering but also from new public administration. These are: the complexity of politics; the challenge of attribution; the danger or distortive incentives; and the interrelated questions of product and process and quantitative and qualitative measures. Problems of measurement are clearly complicated by the fact that the Agency does not deliver service directly, has limited control over its complex and sensitive area, across international borders and diverse political systems and cultures. The article includes a discussion or some innovative qualitatively-oriented USAID responses to these problems.

TOP CIVIL SERVANTS UNDER CONTRACT

LAEGREID, PER

Public Administration, n.º 4/2000, pág. 879

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Formal changes. 3.Implementation and experiences. 4. Discussion: divergingreforms. 5. Conclusion.

TOWARDS A BETTER PUBLIC LAW?

CRAM, IAN;BELL, JOHN

Public Administration, n.º 2/1996, pág. 239

Sumario
1. Introducción. 2. The law commission's report. 3. The role of judicial review: an alternative account. a) Exclusivity. b) Time limits. c) Leave stage. d) Standing. 4. The continuity of administrative acton: some final thoughts.

TRADITIONS OF GOVERNANCE: INTERPRETING THE CHANGING ROLE OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR

BEVIR, MARK; RHODES, R.A.W.; WELLER, PATRICK

Public Administration, n.º 1/2003, pág. 1

Sumario
1. THE REFORMS. 2. THE APROACH. 3. THE ARTICLES. 4. ACNOWLEDGEMENT.

TRANSFORMING SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION FOR THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY: TOWARDS ONE-STOP SERVICES AND THE CLIENT GROUP PRINCIPLE?

BELLAMY, CHRISTINE

Public Administration, n.º 2/1996, pág. 159

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Complexity and diversity: the administrative problems of social security. 3. The whole person concept. 4. The information agenda implied by the whole-person concept. 5. The technology agenda in the operational strategy. 6. The implementation of the operational strategy; the reversion to automation...

TRANSPORT POLICY PARADIGMS AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: THE NORWICH INNER RING ROAD

GREENAWAY, JOHN;GRANTHAM, ANDREW

Public Administration, n.º 4/2000, pág. 815

Sumario
1. Policy paradigm shift, environmental polices androads policy in Britain. 2. The Norwich inner ring road: abrief history 1945-1994. 3. The bureaucratic momentum of thepolicy. 4. Multi-actored politics and critical decisionpoints. 5. The case study and explanations of changing roadspolicy.

TRENDS IN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: PART 1 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVES

LOWNDES, VIVIEN;PRATCHETT, LAWRENCE;STOKER, GERRY

Public Administration, n.º 1/2001, pág. 205

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. The use of different methods.3. Trends and innovations in participation. 4. Facilitatorsand barriers to enhancing public participation. 5. Thedrawbacks of public participation. 6. The impact ofparticipation initiatives. 7. Conclusions.

TRENDS IN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: PART 2- CITIZENS' PERSPECTIVES

LOWNDES, VIVIEN;PRATCHETT, LAWRENCE;STOKER, GERRY

Public Administration, n.º 2/2001, pág. 445

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Why do citizens participate? 3.Why don't citizens participate?. a) A negative view of thelocal authority. b) A lack of awareness about opportunitiesto participate. c) A lack of council response. d) "It's notfor people like me"- issues of social exclusion. 4.Conclusion.

UNDERSTANDING POLICY TRANSFER: A MULTI-LEVEL, MULTI-DISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVE

EVANS, MARK;DAVIES, JONATHAN

Public Administration, n.º 2/1999, pág. 361

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Problems and the way forward.3. Modelling policy transfer. 4. Demonstrating policytransfer: some methodological and practical issues. 5.Conclusion.

Página 26 de 27