Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

Tu privacidad es importante para nosotros.

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para fines analíticos. La base de tratamiento es el consentimiento, salvo en el caso de las cookies imprescindibles para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio web. Puedes obtener más información en nuestra Política de Cookies.

¿Qué estás buscando?

Centro de Estudios Municipales y de Cooperación Internacional (CEMCI)

THIRD-PARTY POLICING AND INSURANCE: THE CASE OF MARKET-BASED CRIME PREVENTION

ROACH ANLEU, SHARIN L.;GREEN MAZEROLLE, LORRAINE;PRESSER, LOIS

Law And Policy, n.º 1/2000, pág. 67

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Recent trends in policing. 3.Market-based third-party policing: the insurance example. 4.Private and public third-party policing: a theoreticalcomparison. 5. Insurance and the community: an inconsistentlogic?. 6. Summary and conclusion.

THREE STRIKES LEGISLATION AND SENTENCING COMMISSION OBJECTIVES

WRIGHT, RONALD F.

Law And Policy, n.º 4/1998, pág. 429

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Institutional pathologies in sentencing. a) Judicial pathologies. b) Executive pathologies. c) Legislative pathologies. 3. Three strikes legislation and sentencing pathologies. a) Commission states. b) Three strikes jurisdictions. c) Potential commission strategies in the face of three strikes proposals. 4. Commission priorities in limiting the scope of three strikes legislation. a) Blocking passage. b) Scope limits. 5. Conclusion. 6. Notes. 7. References.

TJHE INSTITUTIONAL SOURCES OF STATE SUCCESS IN FEDERALISM LITIGATION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT.

CHEN, PAUL

Law And Policy, n.º 4/2003, pág. 455 a 472

Sumario
1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE CHANGING STATUS OF THE STATES IN THE FEDERAL SYSTEM 3. INCREASING LITIGATION CAPACITY OF STATEATTORNEYS GENERAL: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND DELIBERATE EFFORTS 4. A PRO-STATE AGENDA BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT 5. CONCLUSION

TOO MUCH, TOO LATE: THE ADVOCACY ACT IN ONTARIO

LIGHTMAN, ERNIE S.;AVIRAM, URI

Law And Policy, n.º 1/2000, pág. 25

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Social advocacy in ontario. 3.The advocacy act. 4. The government's dilemmas: too much. 5.The governments dilemmas: too late. 6. The psychiatricpatients' advocacy office (PPAO). 7. The demise of theadvocacy commission. 8. Discussion: what went wrong?. 9.Conclusion.

WARRANTED AND UNWARRANTED COMPLEXITY IN U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES

RUBACK, R. BARRY

Law And Policy, n.º 3/1998, pág. 357

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Background. 3. Establishing the sentencing guidelines. 4. Initial decisions that made the sentencing guidelines complex. 5. Pressures that led and continue to lead to greater complexity. 6. The effects of complexity. 7. Assessing the complexity of the guidelines. 8. Dealing with complexity. 9. Conclusion.

WELFARE REFORM: PRESCRIPTION FOR ABUSE? A REPORT ON NEW RESEARCH STUDIES DOCUMENTING THE RELATIONSHIP OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND WELFARE

JODY, RAPHAEL

Law And Policy, n.º 2/1997, pág. 123

Sumario
1. Introduction. 2. Four major research studies. 3. Comparative prevalence of domestic violence across the studies. 4. Future research areas. 5. Policy implications. 6. Conclusion.

Página 11 de 11