ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN PLANNING

THOMPSON, BRIAN

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 1/1989, pág. 8

I. INTRODUCTION. II. THE REPORT. III. DEVELOPMENT PLAN INQUIRIES. IV. PLANNING APPEALS. V. MAJOR PUBLIC INQUIRIES. VI. COMMENT. VII. CONCLUSION.

AFFORESTATION: CONTROLS AND CONTROVERSIES

COLIN T. REID

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 9/1988, pág. 610

AGRICULTURE AND THE RURAL ECONOMY: TIMES OF CHANGE

BODDINGTON, MICHAEL A. B.

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 15/1989, pág. 1

I. PREAMBLE. II. ALL THAT'S HISTORY. III. AGRICULTURE. IV. THE FUTURE.

APPLICATIONS TO THE HIGH COURT FOR THE REVIEW OF PLANNING DECISIONS

BOYDELL, PETER;LEWIS, MEYRIC

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 3/1989, pág. 146

I. INTRODUCTION. II. THE RIGHT OF CHALLENGE-SECTION 245. III. THE GROUNDS OF APPLICATION-SECTION 245 (4).IV. PRINCIPLES ON WHICH THE COURT WILL ACT - THE SEDDON CASE. V. RECENT DECISIONS ON THE SEDDON PRINCIPLES. V. THE APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW-R.S.C., ORDER 53...

ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT: ADAPTING THE OLD

FALK, NICHOLAS P.H.

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 15/1989, pág. 32

I. THE GOALS OF CONSERVATION. II. POLICIES FOR MINIMISING COSTS. III. PROVIDING INCENTIVES. IV. CONCLUSION.

ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT: CREATING THE NEW

GRAHAM, GORDON

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 15/1989, pág. 41

CONSERVATION AREAS - STEINBERG AND AFTER

MILLICHAP, DENZIL

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 4/1989, pág. 233

I. SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID TO. II. FIRST INTERPRETATION. III. SECOND INTERPRETATION. IV. THIRD INTERPRETATION. V. APPEARANCE. VI. CHARACTER. VII. PRESERVE. VIII. ENHANCE. IX. A POSITIVE/ NEGATIVE SPECTRUM? X. CONCLUSION.

CONSERVATION AREAS AND STEINBERG-THE INSPECTORATE'S RESPONSE.

MILLICHAP, DENZIL.

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 7/1989, pág. 498

1. INTRODUCTION. 2. THE "HARM" TEST. 3. "PRESERVE ORìENHANCE". 4. ENHANCEMENT. 5. PRESERVATION ORìENHANCEMENT-ABSOLUTE OR RELATIVE? 6. CONSERVATION AREAS ANDìOTHER KEY POLICIES. 7. "CHARACTER OR APPEARANCE" 8. LISTEDìBUILDINGS. 9. GREEN BELT. 10. CONCLUSION.

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES

SHELBOURN, C.

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 5/1989, pág. 323

I. DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POWERS. II. CONCLUSION.

DISHES OF THE DAY: PLANNING AND THE NEW MEDIA .

MERCER;MERCER, EDWARD

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 2/1988, pág. 75

I. DEVELOPMENT BY TELECOMMUNICATIONS OPERATORS. II.ìOTHER TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT. III. DOMESTICìDWELLINGS.

DISHES OF THE DAY:PLANNING AND THE NEW MEDIA.

MAX VAN DEN BERG;MAX VAN DEN BERG, IR.

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 2/1988, pág. 75

I. DEVELOPMENT BY TELECOMMUNICATIONS OPERATORS. II.ìOTHER TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT. III. DOMESTICìDEWLLINGS.

E.I.A. AND B.P.E.O.: ACRONYMS FOR GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING?

WOOD, CHRISTOPHER

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 5/1988, pág. 310

I. BEST PRACTICABLE ENVIRONMENT OPTION. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT. III. ACHIEVING B.P.E.O. BY USING E.I.A.. IV. IRVINE PAPER MILL. V. LOMAX OPENCAST COAL MINE. VI. SOUTH WARWICKSHIRE DEEP COAL MINE. VII. CONCLUSIONS.

FRESH OBSTACLES TO PLANNING ENFORCEMENT

PARKES, WALTER

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 4/1989, pág. 246

I. R.V. POLLY NEWLAND. II. R.V. KUXHAUS. III. THRASYVOULOU V. SECRETARY OF STATE. IV. CONCLUSION.

FROM PLANNING GAIN TO COMMUNITY BENEFIT

LICHFIELD, NATHANIEL

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 3/1989, pág. 68

I. WHY THE CONTINUING UNCERTAINTY IN PLANNING GAIN. II. FUZZY CONTEXT OF PLANNING GAIN. III. FUZZY CONTEXT OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL. IV. IS THERE A ROLE FOR PLANNING GAIN AT ALL? V. SOME DISTORTIONS TO PLANNING FROM PLANNING GAIN. VI. MAKING AN HONEST WOMAN OF PLANNING GAIN...

HERITAGE LEGISLATION

SUDDARDS, ROGER W.

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 15/1989, pág. 46

I. WHAT IS A LISTED BUILDING? II. APPEAL AGAINST LISTING. III. THE IMMUNITY PROCEDURE. IV. THE LEGALISTIC APPROACH. V. BUILDINGS UPON BUILDINGS. VI. FACADISM. VII. TAXATION. VIII. REPAIRS NOTICES. IX. FINALE.

MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS: AN EVER EXPANDING CONCEPT?

PURDUE, MICHAEL

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 3/1989, pág. 156

I. SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS. II. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS. III. PERSONAL CONSIDERATIONS. V. CONCLUSIONS.

NOISE POLLUTION LAW ENFORCEMENT

HAWKE, NEIL;HIMAN, JOAN

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 2/1988, pág. 84

I. NOISE AS A POLLUTANT. II. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE COMMON LAW. III. MODES OF CONTROL. IV. PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION AND MEASUREMENT. V. CONCLUSIONS.

NOISE: THE PROBLEM OF OVERLAPPING CONTROLS

BETTLE, JANET

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 22/1988, pág. 79

THE CAUSES OF ACTION.

PLANNING CONTROL AN DUTCH BLINDS.

TURRALL-CLARKE;TURRALL-CLARKE, ROBERT

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 3/1988, pág. 151

I. BLINDES AND CANOPIES WITHOUT ADVERTISEMENTS. II.ìBLINDES AND CANOPIES WITH ADVERTISEMENTS. III. ADVERTISEMENTìPROSECUTIONS.

PRESENT CONCERNS IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

SUMMERTON, NEIL W.

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 15/1989, pág. 56

PRIVACY IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS: A DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DILEMMA.

SNEDDON;SNEDDON, DAVID

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 1/1988, pág. 3

I. INTRODUCTION. II. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIONìBACKGROUND, III. IDEOLOGICAL DILEMMA. IV. INTERPRETATIONALìDILEMMAS. V. PROFESSIONAL DILEMMAS. VI. CONCLUSIONS.ì

PROCEDURAL DEFECTS AND OUSTER CLAUSES.

YOUNG;YOUNG, ERIC

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 5/1988, pág. 301

I. BACKGROUND. II. SMITH AND ANISMINIC. III.ìHAMILTON, OSTLER AND MCCOWAN. IV. FAILURE TO SERVE NOTICE.ìV. MACDAID. VI. MCDAID AT FIRST INSTANCE. VII.ìDISTINGUISHING MCDAID. VIII. MARTIN: OTHER ISSUES. IX.ìPATEL. X. CONCLUSION.

PROPERTY IN NEED OF MAINTENANCE: SECTION 65 NOTICES.

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 3/1988, pág. 154

REGINA V. WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL, EX PARTE MONAHAN

DESMOND HEAP, SIR

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 1/1989, pág. 3

I. WHY THE FUSS? II. THE LOCAL PLAN AND THE OPERA HOUSE. III. A QUESTION OF BALANCE. IV. "OTHER MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS" -FINANCES. V. CONFORT FOR THE UPSET. VI FINANCES-CONSIDERATION AND REJECTION. VII. ALL CLEAR. VIII. CODA.

RIVER POLLUTION: A CASE FOR A PRAGAMATIC APPROACH TO ENFORCEMENT

WATCHMAN, PAUL Q.;BARKER, C. R. AND;ROWAN-ROBINSON, J.

JOURNAL OF PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT LAW, n.º 10/1988, pág. 674

I. ENFORCEMENT POLICY. II. RESOUCER FOR ENFORCEMENT. III. THE "REPUTABLE" OFFENDER. IV. PENALTIES FOR REGUALTORY CRIME. V. CONCLUSION.